Use our rumours form to send us leafs trade rumors.
Text Size Adjuster: 18px
Site last updated: 22:10:11 Site updated with larger posting forms, text size adjuster (just before the start of the posts) and dark mode / light mode (toggle top right).
17 Feb 2026 22:07:53
Leafs need trade to bring in assets to make bigger trades.
Final targets should be Werenski and Wallsteadt.
Laughton to anyone for 1st + lower pick/ prospect
Reilly for 2nd + prospect (Can take back salary in this deal)
McMann sounds like he might fetch a 1st
Carlo for 1st
Stolarz for highest asset
OEL for highest asset
Jarnkrok for anything
Leafs trade most of these assets gained + Cowan for Werenski
Leafs trade another 1st, Roy, Danford, Hilldeby for Wallsteadt
Leafs build around Matthews, Nylander, Knies, werenski, Wallsteadt and return to playoffs next year
Next year
Knies-Matthews-Domi
Maccelli-Tavares-Nylander
Blank-Blank-Robertson
Lorentz-Blank-Blank
Werenski-Tanev
McCabe-Blank
Blank-Stetcher
Wallsteadt
Woll
Holes to fill but this roster can be dangerous and there is cap space available.
Believable0Unbelievable0
18 Feb 2026 00:25:54
Insanity.
Agree0Disagree0
18 Feb 2026 12:24:22
If Maccelli and Domi are still on the team and playing in the top 6 then we will miss the playoffs next year too! Maccelli has a qualifying offer of around $4 million so no thanks he can walk if not traded!
Agree0Disagree0
18 Feb 2026 20:04:28
So you do all this then hope to sign 4 new forwards yet to be determined along with 2 defensemen yet to be determined and possibly 3 defensemen if Tanev doesn't bounce back from possible career ending situation. Also throw in that you got rid of Stolarz and Hildeby who both Joeseph Wolll gets along with and you bring in Wallsteadt who looks like he could be a good one but that is based on a small sample of 28 career games in the NHL. And you are giving up in that single trade for goalie with those 28 games, Roy, Hildeby who is just coming into his own and 1st round pick as well as Danford who was a 1st round pick. Then what happens if Woll says. Hey if you are in full rebuild and you see me as a backup then trade me. Then you have a unproven goalie with no backup plan .
17 Feb 2026 00:32:04
This may be the type of deal we could do for Rielly.
To Utah: Rielly
To Tor: Ian Cole + 2nd rd pick 2026
Cole is a 36yo expiring contract. By helping another team out by taking out an expiring contract may help us get a 2nd for Rielly without using retention for 4 years. This guy cannot play another year for the Leafs. I think he will do well somewhere else but he needs a change of scenery.
Believable0Unbelievable0
17 Feb 2026 12:34:00
Leafs would absolutely get another prospect to come back in a trade like that. With a potential cap space peice aswell.
17 Feb 2026 00:25:28
Who is Cerrato? Giving up Laughton Mcmann and Benoit for that is the biggest joke I’ve seen so far 🤣😂🤣🤣.
Agree0Disagree0
17 Feb 2026 20:01:51
Have to agree Blowhard, very poor return.
Cerritos is an unsigned average NCAA player.
Replace Nystrom with Charles-Alexis Legault, keep Nadeau in the deal and take Kotkaniemi off their hands I’m in.
Think Kotkaniemi has more to show and give.
Agree0Disagree0
17 Feb 2026 20:19:06
Nadeau and Cerrato would be good adds but Nystrom is a undersize D man I would like the first 2 but add in another good prospect for sure. Have to see how bad Cerrato's injury is for Penn State though. It might be season ending they say.
Agree0Disagree0
17 Feb 2026 21:35:02
@ RandySears Cerrato if he hadn't missed games would have almost exactly the same amount of points as McKenna. By all reports he is not average. He is good offensively but extremely good defensively. Just curious why the mention of him being a unsigned NCAA player?
Agree0Disagree0
17 Feb 2026 21:46:38
Also Take Nystrom out and put Stankoven in and that is a good deal. We might have to sweeten the deal slightly to get him though. Stankoven can play both wings if needed and he puts his ego in check when they put him out as a defensive center. Love that kid. He has a engine that has no quit.
15 Feb 2026 20:46:37
I could see a slight possibility that Edmonton would bite on that if they fail on other trade fronts. They do need another forward with size and experience. Howard has a good upside though so the leafs might need to sweeten it.
The Pittsburgh deal I can't see happening. Kindel is way to bright of a budding star. He is playmaker similar to Mitch Marner in that linemates need to be ready for a pass that there doesn't seem to be enough room to make. He is a battler along the boards too which given his smaller stature is surprising. But his lower body leg strength is solid. Makes sense with both his parents being ex professional soccer players. I can't see them giving him up at all.
Agree0Disagree0
17 Feb 2026 00:30:31
Rielly won’t get traded until off season. He’s not waving. Laughton for Howard straight up seems doabke but only if leafs retain salary.
15 Feb 2026 17:47:34
So we all kind of throw ideas out there if it was just a trade, or a retool or a rebuild. I don't think I have thrown a full blown rebuild scenario out there but here goes a attempt at one. Where we need to keep a few veterans around for some stability in the dressing room and to speak to the media as the teams grows and matures. Also keep a select few of leafs younger guys that still have not hit their peak. And a few depth players that allows younger guys to do a stint or two in the minors when needed that extra time to work on their game.
Islanders- Matthews and Macelli
Leafs- Cal Ritchie, Cole Eiserman, Kashawn Aicheson Islanders 2nd 2026 and 1st 2027
.
San Jose Sharks - Bobby McMann, Morgan Reilly, 35% retained by leafs, Brandon Carlo
Leafs- 1st in 2026, 1st in 2027
.
Montreal- Jarnkrok
Leafs - 2nd in 2027
.
Edmonton- Laughton
Leafs - 2nd 2026
.
St. Louis-Stolarz, Nicolas Roy, The 1st round picks in 2026 and 2027 that we obtained from San Jose
Leafs- Robert Thomas, Philip Broberg
So the lineup without moving Nylander would look something like this. If everyone cracked the lineup and not counting free agent signings.
Draft picks still left and added 2- 2nds in 2026 a 1st in 2027 and a 2nd in 2027
Difference with Salary Cap would be a savings of $10,577,000
Obviously not the final complete moves of the rebuild but a good mix of young blood and veterans to move ahead with. Some trades could be done before the deadline and others before the draft. A bit chaotic of a post but in the long run we are deep at Centre for the future and we have some draft capital finally and financial room for the future. The draft capital and salary cap room opens up possible further bigger additions. Enjoy the slight warm up in the weather folks.
Believable0Unbelievable0
15 Feb 2026 21:55:26
Ya big no on all. 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻.
Agree0Disagree0
15 Feb 2026 22:29:24
And your suggestions or reasons are? Im always open to actual hearing the rebuttals.
Agree0Disagree0
16 Feb 2026 00:01:24
The bulk of the trading falls apart when San Jose says no to giving up two 1st round picks for Morgan Rielly, Brandon Carlo and Bobby McMann.
Agree1Disagree0
16 Feb 2026 11:04:35
A lot to unpack here. But if you think you’re getting a second for Jarnkok you’re delusional.
14 Feb 2026 19:35:52
If leafs come out of Olympic break and the players that r being rumoured in trades keep playing well. There is a very good chance leafs fetch multiple 1st picks for them. If that is true then leafs brass needs to entertain all of them and stock the shelves. The 6games b4 the deadline will determine if they will be able to. Carlo, OEL, Mcmann, and dare I say Laughton.
To Tor
1st rd 2027
2nd (blues) 2027
Gudas (exp contract)
Gaucher
To Anaheim
Carlo
Stolarz
To Tor
1st 2026 (Edm)
Chernyshov
To SJS
OEL
To Tor
1st 2026 (Tampa)
4th 2026 (NYR)
2nd 2027 (CBJ)
Villeneuve
To Sea
Laughton (50% retained)
Robertson
Maccelli (50% retained)
I previously had trade with Mcmann going to LAK for another 1st and prospect. With the Fiala injury makes a perfect replacement there. There’s your four 1st rd picks. Then u do what u want with other players like Jarnkrok, Domi, Joshua, Benoit.
Believable0Unbelievable0
15 Feb 2026 03:34:02
Is this a Rebuild OR Retool?
Personally I have little interest in draft picks in exchange for Leaf players.
Draft picks won’t be selected until June of this year.
That is followed by at least another year in juniors and another year or two, (for late 1st round picks), in the AHL, before they are ready to compete for a roster spots.
I feel Leafs should be targeting D+1, D+2 and D+3 prospects some of whom will be ready to compete for roster spots at this falls training camo.
By drafting players who have already been drafted Leafs get a better look at their progress a year, 2 or 3 after they have been drafted.
Agree0Disagree0
15 Feb 2026 10:06:27
Who’s playing defence for you moving forward lol I’ve said many times moving Carlo doesn’t make a ton of sense you paid a fortune to get him and to replace him you will most likely have to do the same. OEL has been great this year but zero chance he pulls that package and the third trade is ok I’m not sure I’d move Laughton personally.
Agree0Disagree0
15 Feb 2026 22:03:04
Gudas takes Carlo’s spot. You still have Benoit Rielly McCabe on your left side. What r u talking about who plays d. As for no interest in picks especially 1st rd picks or good 2nd rd and 4th rd picks is a ridiculous statement. Those can be used to acquire good players and nhl players not prospects bounced back and fourth from the minors for the last 2-3 yrs. Deep draft a lot of good players to choose from this year and next. Draft picks get u players prospects don’t.
Agree0Disagree0
18 Feb 2026 00:29:49
Ducks GM dry heaves
Kraken GM falls off his chair laughing.
14 Feb 2026 18:40:20
To Tor
1st 2026
Wright
To LA
Mcmann
After Fiala out perfect replacement. They know they will be in for a bidding war so hence the 1st and a good prospect.
Believable0Unbelievable0
15 Feb 2026 03:44:14
I was just looking at a list of LA Kings top 10 prospects.
I do not see any prospect named Wright.
Then I looked at LA Kings lineup.
I see no player by the name Wright.
Were you thinking of Wright, the former 4th overall pick by the Seattle Kraken?
If Leafs are looking to trade McMann to the LA Kings for a prospect, I would like to see them target: Henry Brzustewicz, RHD, 19, 6’2”, 203 lbs, (London Knights, OHL)
Agree0Disagree0
15 Feb 2026 16:51:25
He is talking about Jared Wright.
Agree1Disagree0
17 Feb 2026 00:47:21
Jared wright 6’3 190lbs 23yrs old R shot RW.
14 Feb 2026 09:30:04
No because you just fixed one problem and created another the leafs need to draft there own Faber that’s the only way to get your hands on a top dman.
Agree0Disagree0
14 Feb 2026 16:51:21
2nd move would be
Nylander and Reilly to ANH
4
McTavish, Sennecke, Helleson.
Agree0Disagree0
14 Feb 2026 17:28:27
Swap out mctavish for either Carlson or Gauthier and I’m sold don’t like mctavish.
Agree0Disagree0
14 Feb 2026 17:41:37
Your first trade not a chance I’m giving ninny Matthews for that weak two players. You joking Clarky?
Agree0Disagree0
14 Feb 2026 21:31:00
I would do Faber and Boldy on that first deal.
Agree0Disagree0
15 Feb 2026 03:46:32
Faber and Ek would do but Faber and Boldy would be much better.
That said, would Matthews have any interest in going to Minnesota?
Agree0Disagree0
15 Feb 2026 10:08:34
Question I would ask clarky is why would either team trade the up and coming players for guys who are stars but haven’t won anything.
Agree0Disagree0
17 Feb 2026 00:50:21
Minny would jump at Matthews for those / guys but if I was Toronto it would be a no thank you. Boldy then we r talking not EK.
13 Feb 2026 23:59:05
With Kevin Fiala Suffering possibly a season ending injury against Canada today does anyone think the leafs phone might be ringing in regards to a Bobby McMann deal? Left Winger goes down. L. A says "We hear through the grapevine you have a Left Winger you have been shopping around the league, and you don't have a 1st round pick this year. Well it just so happens. ".
Believable1Unbelievable0
14 Feb 2026 17:29:10
If a first is on the table I definitely trade Mcmann there.
13 Feb 2026 10:07:09
Too old . picks and prospects to restock the cupboards.
Agree0Disagree0
13 Feb 2026 19:01:36
Way off. It’s a retool don’t need or want karlsson.
Agree0Disagree0
13 Feb 2026 20:28:16
I Like Brazeau, But Karlsson is needed in Pittsburgh with Letang slowing down, even with his hefty contract. Dubas has always liked both Robertson and Reilly though.
How does this one sound. We trade them Reilly and retain $2.5 and Robertson as well as Mcmann who might sign with the GM who signed him as a undrafted player and gave him his start in the NHL as well as our 3rd round pick this year. In return we get Pittsburghs 1st in 2026, Brazeau who is a big serviceable player and Harrison Brunicke who is going to be a stud on Defence.
We get a great prospect who didn't look out of place in games in Pittsburgh or in the AHL and is Looking fantastic in Kamloops. He was a shotblocking and hitting machine at the WJC's this year. The only reason he is back in Junior is to get major minutes and Kamloops has a good shot of going far in the Playoffs.
Agree0Disagree0
13 Feb 2026 21:11:49
Sorry I meant to add that with Sid being in Pittsburgh and with Robertson going there it allows Pittsburgh to make a crazy offer to Jason Robertson as a UFA. They have the draft picks to make it happen whether it is just under the 11,700,192 or over the 11,700,183 and they will also have the cap space to do it. Maybe Dallas works out a deal with Pittsburgh before the deadline on that front. Or somehow a 3 way with Leafs, Dallas and Pittsburgh could be worked on.
Agree0Disagree0
13 Feb 2026 21:20:36
I’d do this Karlsson for the same price as Reilly for less term I’m in.
Agree0Disagree0
13 Feb 2026 23:05:08
Yes Leafs GM me too. We only have him on books for 2 more seasons at 7.5M where as Reilly would be 4 more. I’d rather a 40 year old Karlsson over a 30-31 year old Reilly plus getting Brazeau? I’d be taking it plus it helps get our PP puck moving D until we develop one of our own.
Agree0Disagree0
13 Feb 2026 23:07:36
@suffering stop suggesting trading McMann to me. It’s dumb, we will not get back a player of his value and a late 1st is not worth Bobby McMann. If it’s a retool, Bobby stays. If you’re rebuilding from bottom up then yes go get a 1st for him but they are not doing that. So don’t just move good players just for the sake of getting draft capital back.
Agree0Disagree0
14 Feb 2026 04:19:22
Who said I was trading McMann for just the mid 1st round pick Clarky? He is for the 1st and the key to the deal to get Brunicke. A younger version of Chris Tanev with his shot blocking but also a very mobile defenceman. At 36 years of age Tanev if he does the groiin surgery may not play again for the leafs anyway we need to stock the cupboard now. Robertson is straight up for Brazeau and Reilly and eating 2.5 of his contract is just a added player to entice the full deal. And to open up cap room for the leafs.
I jcan see Pittsburgh adding Reilly because they need veteran depth on D but not if they have to give up Karlsson who actually is playing the best 2 way hockey he has played in his career. They would certainly want Toronto to eat part of Reillys contract. For them to give up their Power play quaterback and you to ask them to eat part of Karlsson's contract doesn't make sense for them to do.
P. S didn't you suggest trading Nylander and Matthews and others in a massive deal I did call you dumb? No I said the returns looked decent other than swapping a few pieces. Im just playing Devils advocate on this one. It has to make sense for both teams.
Depending on if they make the playoffs or don't that First round pick can be used for both a retool (Trading it and a player for a better player in the off season. ) or a rebuild by using the pick or Trading it and a player to move up the Draft board.
I think if they could land Brunicke that at least 2 of him and Danford and Chadwick will be stalwarts with the leafs and possibly all 3. I have never said McMann is a bad player but he is a good trade piece given the free agency thing. Plus I think Holinka is going to be a pleasant surprise for fans and open eyes at Training Camp
.
Agree0Disagree0
14 Feb 2026 16:54:34
Not true Suffering I used the word dumb when you said you were retooling and then go on to trade McMann. If we are rebuilding and Moving Matthews and Nylander I’d be ok with trading Bobby for a 1st.
Agree0Disagree0
14 Feb 2026 17:32:49
I never said retool at all. regarding this post.
11 Feb 2026 21:08:12
OMG! I need to call 911. I think I broke a couple of ribs because I was laughing so hard at this one. lol
Why in the world would a team that is in a playoff hunt trade their top centerman for a backup goalie and number 7 defenseman and basically do a swap of comparable prospects. That's basically asking Utah to tank so we can walk into their wildcard spot. Hey if Utah wants to do this deal I'd be all in but I don't expect the phone to ring anytime soon.
Agree0Disagree0
12 Feb 2026 11:44:24
Isn’t that top Center a UFA this summer?
Agree0Disagree0
12 Feb 2026 12:27:19
Yes he is but it sounds like he wants to resign. If they don't want to sign him they would not trade him before the deadline while they are in a playoff position. If they trade his rights before July 1 on a trade and sign deal then hey I would do that deal as Toronto but right now it won't happen. Utah has a good thing going and if you traded your number 1 center and fell out of the playoffs because of it that would not enhance your season ticket sales for next year at all.
Agree0Disagree0
12 Feb 2026 19:55:09
To add to my last response. If they were to let him go for a trade and sign after the season they would have to then make a major free agent signing or a major trade deal. They are struggling for attendance. Yes they have a lot of obstructed views which limits sales to 12,000 but even with renovations they will still be one of the lower seating capacities in the league.
Plus the owners in the league are already showing concern that even with Technically sold out games, the Sunday and midweek games have huge empty seats in the lower bowl. They need to make the playoffs and make them consistently or this cursed Phoenix team could be moving once again at some point. Utah may not be the hotbed they had hoped for in regards to Hockey. A good exciting team should fill the arena no matter the day of the week the game is played.
Agree0Disagree0
13 Feb 2026 16:21:54
Tij iginla alone gets more than the leafs offer here lol.