Use our rumours form to send us leafs trade rumors.
Text Size Adjuster: 18px
Site last updated: 19:41:10 Site updated with larger posting forms, text size adjuster (just before the start of the posts) and dark mode / light mode (toggle top right).
28 Jan 2026 15:18:31
Tor: mcmann
Edm: mangiapane 1st 2027
For taking on mangiapane contract and the fact that mcmann is a 15-25 goal guy it’s gonna cost Edmonton a 1st I think what valuable about mcmann also is that he makes 1.35 almost all contenders can make that money work truthfully I’d wait till the deadline to trade him but if someone steps up make the deal.
Believable0Unbelievable0
28 Jan 2026 18:08:09
If McMann continues to produce, there should be no need to take back a contract. He should be owed very little and cost very little against the cap as is. He should get a 1st or 2nd and 3rd type of return.
27 Jan 2026 18:00:42
To Toronto
Sean Walker $3.6M
2027 2nd
To Carolina
Stolarz $2.5M
Walker signed for 3 more years at $3.6M. He can definitely play on the 2nd pairing and also play on the PP.
Carolina needs some goaltending & Stolarz is signed for another 4 years at $3.75M. I believe the Leafs can also get a 2nd round pick because Carolina really needs goaltending (would take a 2027 3rd, if the 2nd is too much to give up for Carolina) .
Believable0Unbelievable0
27 Jan 2026 18:51:27
Be nice if they could get it.
Agree0Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 23:53:05
Tags this is a very good trade. Makes most sense for both teams compared to most trades on this site. I just think if Stolarz could stay healthy and get back to his game, he is one of the best goalies in the league. Almost like I’d like to let the goalie situation play out and make a move like this for Woll or Stolarz in the offseason.
Agree0Disagree0
28 Jan 2026 12:43:57
Solid deal. The issue for the Canes I see on the Cane side is, who replaces Walker in their lineup? The guy logs 22+ mins a night for them, which is too much already imo, but shows how little confidence they have in the rest.
Not sure Canes would feel giving up their minute muncher for a goalie is worth it. Might need to look at a prospect like Cerrato and a 2nd or something like that.
26 Jan 2026 20:49:32
Red Wings: Danielson, Wallinder, 1st rd 2026
Leafs: Nylander, Robertson, 4th rd 2026.
Believable0Unbelievable1
26 Jan 2026 20:14:43
No but. Include some crazy asset if they make it to the finals or even win the cup.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 21:08:07
It’s a simple no. They r a division rival and you are making them better and you a lot worse cause that 1st will be a high pick worth nothing just like the 2 prospects you suggested. that's not enough for Willy and you want to throw in Rob and and 4th. Must be a Wings fan. Same goes for JB for making that ridiculous counter proposal. 😂😂😂🥴.
Agree1Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 01:36:00
It would be Axel sandin-pelikka instead and you wouldn’t have to add Robertson. Nylander has a ton of value.
Agree1Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 20:46:38
It would be Lucas Raymond and Sandin-Pelleka.
26 Jan 2026 16:01:19
I don’t think Matthews honestly wants to be in a Leafs jersey much longer and definitely not past this 4yr contact that expires 2028’. So here’s a couple players I’ve mentioned I’m curious what you guys think of this
Leafs Matthews 50% retention on his 2 remaining yrs
For this huge retention
Ducks B Sennecke, R McQueen, Stian Solberg
Future first line or worst 2nd line C and first line RW with a Top 4 D man. Think Sennecke can play C too. Remember Sennecke is on his ELC so paying 34 for 2 more yrs and getting Solberg for doing so doesn’t hurt.
Believable1Unbelievable0
26 Jan 2026 19:35:16
Are you from another planet? 😂😂😂 that is the most ridiculous package I’ve ever seen so far for Matthews here. Not only is that not enough but 50% retention to boot. Are you for real? 🤣😂🤣🤣.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 19:48:09
You and JB123 need to sit back and be observers and stop posting ridiculous and outlandish trades.
Agree2Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 20:05:16
I like most of the deal, but, the leafs would need draft picks coming back aswell since trading Matthews with retention is a fireworks show stating rebuild.
Agree4Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 20:16:18
Blowhard u should stick to golf or volleyball bud. Your the worse. Lol and I bet u can blowhard. Lol good nickname wonder why that call you that.
Agree2Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 23:27:09
Hey blowhard…. Chill lil dude! My point is Sennecke is going to be really good so should the other two. I forgot Matthews garner the best return in the history of the NHL right? Tell me what then guy?
Agree4Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 23:39:15
I like the trade but feel the Ducks need to add a couple of future 2nd round picks.
A future top 6 Center, top 6 RW and a 2nd pairing defenseman (all on ELCs) is a good return for a player who doesn’t appear to really want to be a Leaf any more.
Add in a couple of 2nd round picks, 2026, 2028) and you can include me as a Leaf fan who wants to see a big roster shakeup.
Let’s do the same with Willie “The Finger” Styles.
Let the rebuild begin as this roster isn’t going anywhere but backwards.
By the way Blowhard, for a guy that makes as many questionable proposals as you do, you might want to consider being a little more polite.
Agree1Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 10:25:19
Should could would. Matthews is already elite. You r not retaining on him. That’s a fact. Plus his value is sky high to the contrary of what you 🥴 may think. I’m convinced you three guys are the same person just posting the same nonsense. Cause you all seem to be responding to me in the same way with the same nonfactual gibberish. Water🦬 u should just stop all together cause every time you post you don’t even have your facts straight or know which player is on which team. 🥴🤣😂🤣.
Agree0Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 12:48:23
Shouldn't be any need for retention on Matthews. Leafs take on Strome as well and Ducks also give Luneau and I would seriously consider it if I were the Leafs. Sennecke is a player as you said. Good size, pretty physical and very skilled.
Agree1Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 13:29:11
Blowhard24,
While I agree that trade is poorly constructed I think you are hilarious.
You do love to stir the pot claiming erroneously that you’re the only that is factual.
We’ve all read your posts and know that they are often not supported by fact but rather opinions. To say Matthews trade value is sky high is a perfect example of your bluster.
But it does clarify that the number 24 in your username is the number of beer you consume when you post.
Please continue to add to my comic relief and daily entertainment.
26 Jan 2026 15:22:27
If we’re retooling maybe send middle finger to….
Tor sends Nylander, Dakota Mermis
LA sends L Greenetree, Alex Laferrière and Mikey Anderson, 2026 1st.
Maybe light but I think Willy would waive to go and I’m not sure what else or who LA could offer on top of this return.
Believable0Unbelievable1
26 Jan 2026 15:15:33
Extremely light.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 23:43:27
I’m pretty sure that Liam Greentree is an LA Kings prospect not a Rangers prospect unless I missed a trade recently.
Lafreniere has been a complete non factor in the Rangers lineup for the past two years.
He is not someone I would be trading for as his attitude has been described as Laissez - fair, a complaint many Leaf fans have about Willie Styles.
Agree0Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 07:48:20
At WB talking about LA. Two different Lafenerriere players. Rangers guy is Alexis my guy in the proposal with L Greenetree is Alex. Check the LA roster I made the correct people and teams.
Agree1Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 12:53:35
Seems like a reasonable return.
26 Jan 2026 14:43:23
It's been a screwed up year to say the least. Injuries galore and rarely has the team been actually healthy. Have to make some real change. Yes, I know some of these have NMC's, but this is a trade prop site. Here's the guys I would look to move to reset this team in no specific order. Rielly, McCabe, Roy and Robertson. Need to move some value to get some value back if the Leafs are doing a reset.
SJ
McCabe $4.513M
Tor
Chernyshov ELC
2026 1st (EDM)
McCabe is exactly what the Sharks need for their backend with many becoming UFA's end of season. Leafs get a really good prospect and a 1st.
ANA
Roy $3M
Tor
Luneau ELC
Colangelo $.850M
Roy is the type of player I could see Anaheim target for their playoff run. Leafs get players I have mentioned a few times.
Chi
Rielly $7.5M
Tor
Behm - unsigned
2026 2nd (Tor)
Rielly would be a great vet fit for the rebuilding Hawks. They need some vets to play with their youth. They can also afford his cap hit. Leafs get a good prospect and their 2nd back.
LA
Robertson $1.825M
Tor
Ziemmer ELC
2026 2nd
LA is desperate for some potential goal scoring and could be willing to pay for some, especially if the player is still young. Leafs get a B prospect that plays a hard game and a 2nd.
Obviously move Jarnkrok for whatever they can get.
In the end, Leafs clear tons of cap space. About $14M in cap space for next season. Get a puck moving, young D-man. Some very good forward prospects and restock some picks.
If it was me, I would re-sign McMann and Laughton. Laughton moves to 3C.
Believable4Unbelievable0
26 Jan 2026 15:20:42
Like it all but we need a 2c. I’m assuming sign one in FA with all the added cap space. I just don’t think Reilly waves for Chi unfortunately. You r suggesting keeping Maccelli? I would think his latest play will get u a nice return.
Agree1Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 18:03:09
With the cap space gained and assets added, the Leafs could look in free agency for a 2C or make a trade for one.
With $35M to spend, they could look at adding Andersson on the backend if he makes it to free agency. Also re-sign McMann, Laughton and yes, Maccelli as there shouldn't be any raise for him. They could look at guys like Tuch and Marchment as well. Probably have to trade for a 2C, but they would have the assets for once.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 19:50:24
Zero chance Reilly waives to go to Chicago.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 23:51:27
I definitely like the idea of a little spring cleaning for young prospects and a few picks.
I think Rielly only waives for a return to his hometown, Vancouver.
I do not see any benefit whatsoever in resigning Maccelli’s a non factor in 90% of the games he has played.
I would like to resign Laughton, McMann and Stecher.
I have been a little disappointed with Roy and Joshua and would be in agreement with trading either or both of them.
Carlo is another Leaf to add to the trade list after Treliving’s ill fated trade of Minten and a 1st.
Agree0Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 02:56:44
Bob. I said right at the start i know about the NMC's, but that this is a trade prop site afterall.
Agree1Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 13:00:55
Not sure why people are still against Maccelli. He has looked good since coming back. 11 pts on those 19 games. That's a 47 pt pace. Carries the puck well, speedy, good vision, will backcheck. He's looked fine. Need some speed and vision as well, not just big, physical guys who can skate well enough imo. Leafs just have too many atm with Domi, Maccelli, Robertson and Cowan. Robertson as we all know, is my choice to go.
26 Jan 2026 11:34:43
PREDS 3pts out of playoff spot are they still sellers or buyers? Cause if they r sellers and Leafs are in win now mode like so many ppl are saying. Then why not this for going all in .
To Tor
Stamkos
Blankenberg
Skjei
To Nash
Reilly
Carlo
Maccelli
Robertson.
Believable0Unbelievable1
26 Jan 2026 13:02:46
Nope. Reilly isn't going to wave everyone forget about including him in any trades. Also not giving up Robertson and maccelli. Young guys we need that are the future. Stamkos 35 and blank 31. This trade doesn't get us in the play offs. If your going to trade your young talent get young back or something that will make you serious contenders. This trade would only damage what future the leafs have.
Agree1Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 13:29:51
To leafs: montour, dunn, shephenson
To seattle: carlo, benoit, jarnkrok, solarz, domi.
Agree1Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 13:55:27
Reilly will certainly not waive for Nashville but I think he will waive his NMT or NTC, can’t remember which he has.
The Leafs are not likely to make the playoffs so he might waive for a contender in the West that needs some offence.
Agree1Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 15:37:20
First and foremost blank is 27 not 31. Skjei is 31 and yes Stamkos 35 but 25g and a pp stud. I said win now mode so u don’t worry about Rob, and Mac. He’s got more goals than both combined. Rob wants out and I’m sure Mac would be happy to move on from this botched experiment. Nash a non tax state he would keep more of his 7.5m in his pocket so I most definitely think he would consider waving. Your trade makes no sense
Sea need more scoring what u r offering for what u r getting is a complete joke. They have 2 good goalies with better numbers than Stolarz. Carlo and Benoit for mont and Dunn are u ok? You’ve got over $20m coming in and just $13m going out. Heard of the cap. Think b4 u post.
Agree1Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 16:41:27
Stamkos comes to the keafs mark my words he gets like 30 points next year.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 16:52:01
Add who ever mcmann or Roy. But im glad you cant make these trades cuz we'd be screwed. Bring in 2 old men for 2 young up and coming players? . Why?! You think this trade will get them a cup this year? If not then HELL NO. THE WORSE TRADE IVE SEEN.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 19:44:57
You and Henry77 need to just sit back and observe b4 posting so u understand what you are doing. Newcomers like you guys come and go like the leafs winning streaks. What part of Robertson doesn’t want to be here anymore u don’t understand. He’s not going to be a 25-30 goal scorer on the leafs and Maccelli will neither. Stamkos will finish with at least 40 at the pace he’s on now. Then you justify your ridiculousness by just throwing names together without realizing what you r doing. Casuals like u guys are is what ruined this posting site. Thanks for nothing.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 20:19:27
Robertson could easily be 25-30 goal scorer with the right line mates and ice time. I except that from him within the next 2 years if he stays.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 20:27:31
Maybe not 30 but 20-25 lol.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 20:57:16
Omg. Ok he finishes with 40 THIS year and with THIS team. Doesn't mean rubbish with the leafs and certainly not next year.
Agree0Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 00:03:51
Blowhard, the last thing the Leafs need is Stamkos, another 35 year old, with 4 more years on his $8 million dollar contract.
Brady Skjei at 31 is barely a 3rd pairing defender and we already seem to have half a dozen of those.
Factor in that Skjei has 4 more years to go on his bloated $7 million dollar contract a year contract and this is a veritable disaster.
We are already saddled with far too many past their prime, 30+ year old players which is one of this teams biggest problems.
If you want to see how a team should be built take a look at the Montreal Canadiens.
If the Habs had Leafs goaltending they would be competing for first in the East and they are the youngest team in the league.
Fast and skilled, not old and slow.
For a contributor who so rudely critiques others proposals í would expect something a little better than this from you.
Agree0Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 09:36:06
100% waterbuffalo, couldn't have said it better 👏.
Agree0Disagree0
27 Jan 2026 10:01:04
You guys are seriously delusional and don’t do your homework b4 responding to posts. Buffalo you r so off it’s actually comical. Stamkos has 2 more years at 8m. Skjei is no wear near a 3rd pairing d man top 4 by a country mile and when he’s on his game a top 2. You r swapping him for Reilly which is a 31yrs old with 4 more years at $7.5m. More upside in Skjei than Reilly. Like I said when you don’t do your homework and just want to critique others it makes you look 🥴. This was a go all in trade nothing else. Yes it makes perfect sense.
26 Jan 2026 04:51:10
To Tor
Kuzmenko
2nd 2026
To LA
Reilly
Kings very weak on the left side for offensive dmen.
For Toronto get a right winger on an expiring contract and a 2nd.
Believable0Unbelievable1
26 Jan 2026 08:34:43
At this point I don’t think you get anything for Reilly.
Agree2Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 09:52:22
I beg to differ. He still a very good offensive dman. With the right partner he can still thrive and contribute to a team needing offensive help in the left side. The only d who comes close to his points on La is Clarke with 25pts still behind Reilly and he’s RD. I think he would wave for the sunny skies if LA.
Agree1Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 20:20:35
Reilly not going to wave. He doesn't want to up and move.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 21:59:30
Yeah you are right goat your not getting much for Reilly. Def not what blowme is proposing. And it's a stupid post anyways reilly isn't waving and they aren't going to get what hes worth back even tho it isn't much.
26 Jan 2026 10:19:48
Rather get 1st rd picks need to restock the shelves. Deep drafts coming up the next 2yrs Trev gave away both. We need to make our own picks. This way can give Boston and Philly their picks and still have one each of our own. San Jose would still have to give us prospects as well. Maybe not Miss but the other 2.
26 Jan 2026 09:53:44
At this point give me draft picks instead of prospects. We need to recoup the ones we gave away and start restocking.
Agree0Disagree0
26 Jan 2026 10:23:14
Take out one of the RD and give me a 1st rd pick. As someone suggested Mcmann is worth that in a previous post. I don’t see ducks giving up 2 RD prospects when they r losing Trouba and Gudas end of season.