Use our rumours form to send us leafs trade rumors.
Text Size Adjuster: 18px
Site last updated: 18:08:01
29 May 2026 17:44:52
With all the anxiety and difficulty sorting out the coaching role in Toronto, why not have Matt Sundin be the coach (temporarily (very short term)) until things get sorted out. He might surprise everyone.
Agree0Disagree0
30 May 2026 09:45:15
Well probably because the Leafs management doesn’t have any anxiety lol there’s still a lot of time to find a coach.
Agree0Disagree0
30 May 2026 12:01:53
I don’t follow the logic on this one. We have ample time to put a coach in place. If we put Sundin as “temporary” coach to start the season and then replace him. How does the coach miraculously appear?
Also I think the current Management is still on the fence on what direction they want to go retool, rebuild or a combination.
Once they commit to the direction then they will know what coach they want to target. Because not all coaches at this level are adept at each of those scenarios.
27 May 2026 05:02:00
Had to finish the day off with a Satirical post (Actually most of our posts on here really lol).
Leafs new coach enters the Dressing room at training camp to address the main core that will probably make the team.
"Gentlemen we are employing a new strategy this year. As you know most teams 4th lines get roughly 8 to 12 minutes a game. You will all have to get in great shape because this year our 4th line with only get 20 seconds of 5 on 5 a period. However they will get significant power play time when we are in the other team's zone.
If any of you see one of these 3 players even thinking of going into our defensive zone with the intention of touching a puck, trip them immediately even if we have to take a delay of game penalty to send a message to them to not handle the puck in a zone they are not familiar with. We got these 3 players at a bargain at only $4 Million combined, only for offense on the power play. Give it up for Patrick Laine, Jesse Puljujarvi, and Jeff Skinner"
LOL LOL Oh my god the worst part is if Treliving was still here that could have happened.
Agree2Disagree0
30 May 2026 21:21:30
When Dubas was here, it pretty much did happen.
Agree0Disagree0
31 May 2026 13:51:19
Didn’t know Dubas changed the lines.
And Dubas is ancient history.
26 May 2026 00:41:40
Would love to hear an open debate on who to draft this year.
I am big on getting a D this year. Yes, McKenna is in the draft. So what we get another Marner type player (and won’t be as good). We’ve seen this story before. We need a quarterback who can be an asset on both sides of the puck. I think trading down to get another pick/prospect is the best thing to do and go after Carels, Reid or a few others depending on how far you trade down.
I’ve always heard since I was a kid to build a team from your defence/goalie out, we have a chance to revamp our back end for the next 10-15 years. I just don’t see many teams willing to trade these types of D. Anyways that’s my opinion, let me hear your opinion.
Agree0Disagree0
26 May 2026 01:16:06
I think Verhoeff is going to be a very good one but he still needs a few years because he started playing the position so late after being a goaltender until he was 12.
Reid, I really saw fade as the season progressed. The 2 D-men that have kept rising in stock and seem more NHL ready now that the others in the draft are Albert Smits from Latvia who pro players at the Worlds are blown away by.
The other is Daxon Rudolph who had a great year in the WHL regular season and was a Stud in the playoffs for Prince Albert. Maybe we could pry Vanacker off of Chicago if we flipped the pick to get either one of those D-men if that was the plan.
I wish we could petition the NHL to allow Landon Dupont to be allowed to play as a Underager and I would take him right now, right this minute with our 1st overall.
Agree0Disagree0
26 May 2026 19:48:33
I still say draft McKenna. This kid holds on to pucks longer and still makes plays better than anyone I have seen in quite a while. Not saying he is Kucherov, but he has that ability to drift back from a guy checking him and slid the puck over to a teammate when you think he is done and held the puck too long.
Could even draft him and then trade him in the summer to the highest bidder which could bring back NHL ready D.
Or more likely, the Leafs make other trades to shore up the defence. Nylander for instance could bring back a couple good young NHL ready D. Even if not moving either Nylander or Matthews, Leafs have assets to get some young NHL ready or almost NHL ready D.
Agree0Disagree0
26 May 2026 21:45:24
I agree RLF, he is gonna be good but so was Marner. I feel like we are going down the same path we already went down. Now if they have plans to trade Nylander and Matthews in a rebuild scenario, I would be all for getting McKenna.
But if this is just gonna be a quick retool, then I think this team needs one of those elite young RHD in this draft.
Agree0Disagree0
26 May 2026 21:47:19
@Suffering, yes soo many good D projected to go first round. I hope we get one of them one way or another. If it’s not the 1st overall then I hope they trade one of the big boys to get a D with McKenna.
Agree0Disagree0
26 May 2026 22:41:17
McKenna all day long.
Agree0Disagree0
27 May 2026 08:55:06
@clarky The difference between McKenna and Marner is that McKenna’s ceiling is so much higher… The Leafs draft McKenna, him and Cowan are the future play drivers of this franchise.
Also the problem with the D prospects in this draft is that none of them are NHL ready.
Most scouts say that these guys are still 2-3 years away, which is normal for D men. I think there is a few in the later rounds that are gonna be studs. I really like everything I read about Ethan Mackenzie: physical 2-way defender that plays for keeps; had 22 goals this year in the WHL.
Agree1Disagree0
27 May 2026 21:04:45
@Goat, you can many play drivers but if you’re constantly stuck in your own because our D aren’t mobile enough, or have enough hockey IQ, physicality and no patience with the puck, then it doesn’t matter.
Not sure McKenna is gonna be better than Marner with 90-100 point seasons pretty consistently. Defence wins championships and that’s what I’m interested in. Not just seeing pretty goals once in a while.
Agree0Disagree0
30 May 2026 13:17:38
I’m also drafting McKenna; he’s the best player in my eyes.
I would however seriously listen to offers!
Getting Stenberg plus Sam Dickinson or similar value is not a bad option!
25 May 2026 14:38:38
Best news of the day
Domi is out, complications from surgery
Reevaluation at training camp!!!!
LTIR!!!!!!
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Agree0Disagree0
25 May 2026 14:25:25
You have crossed the line on this one! I would never applaud and consider best news of the day when anyone other than guilty of horrible crimes or similar has Health complications from a surgery. Sorry Golftown, I am not joining your applauding or joy from this news.
Agree5Disagree0
25 May 2026 23:05:42
Yes I regret posting that.
My apologies.
Agree0Disagree0
26 May 2026 01:20:31
No Problem! We sometimes forget these players are real people too. Max is a really good guy and ambassador off the ice. Have met him a few times and with the public and fans he is a really nice guy, his dad who I encountered a few times, not so much.
24 May 2026 10:55:42
Taking a look at the Leafs system of late has me thinking we are in a pretty good spot in short order.
This year with some luck they will get an impact NHL player at 1 then they have a full draft worth of picks which I’m excited to see since we got that guy from Dallas.
Then I look at what guys like Koblar are
doing at the Worlds it’s great to see, Holinka had a great year in the WHL played as a centre wish he was getting ice time in the playoffs.
Cowan is looking pretty good as well and Danford just stepped right in with the Marlies. I think after this draft the Leafs could look at their system and have 4-5+ player as NHL quality which every team needs in order to build a competitive roster.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 18:01:18
If they draft McKenna for instance and move even one of Matthews or Nylander for young prospects +, their player system will look pretty decent. They have some young potential bottom 6 guys already as well, like Valis. Young goalie position seems strong too.
It's why I think that if they moved both Matthews and Nylander with strategic trades that balance each other, the remix to a new culture that would be competitive could happen quicker than some may think.
Agree1Disagree0
24 May 2026 21:01:28
I agree Goat, not the Stanley Cup team yet but heading in the right direction.
With 2 or 3 strategic trades and same number of UFA picks, I’m not as unhappy as I was at the end of season.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 23:33:02
@RLF I think they should move Nylander. If they move one, centres are just too hard to replace.
But the other problem would be the fact that free agency isn’t very good and the chance the Leafs win a Nylander trade is not very high imo
Agree0Disagree0
25 May 2026 15:52:28
Goat. Yes, typically start with the winger before the centre if moving someone.
I think a weak FA market could actually help Nylander's value. There is no Nylander via free agency and GMs are going to overpay guys like Tuch.
Willy's $11.5M may start to look really good if Tuch is asking $10M+ for instance. I'm not predicting anything, but Nylander and Carlo for Sennecke, Luneau+ still seems like a good hockey trade for both teams imo.
Agree0Disagree0
25 May 2026 23:19:26
I still don't see Anaheim letting Sennecke go. I think he showed them with the 4 goals in his last 5 playoff games he can rise to the occasion not only in the regular season but also the playoffs. That is the kind of young guy you do not let go.
Agree0Disagree0
26 May 2026 14:43:26
I don't think he has proven anything yet. As we know, rookies can look great and then drop off or not really take a step. It often takes a few seasons. Happens all the time. Teams will now start preparing for Sennecke and he will have more pressure next season because improvement will be expected. The Western Conference is the weaker conference right now. If Anaheim wants to go for a Cup over the next 2 seasons, getting a vet forward like Nylander and a vet D like Carlo helps as they have huge age gaps between their vets and good young players. Most players on the team are either 25 and under or 32 and over. Nylander and Carlo bridge that age gap and both have lots left in the tank. That said, Sennecke looks like he will be a good one.
As for the playoffs, yes he had 4 goals in the last 5 games. But he struggled greatly defensively and was a -7 in the playoffs. His line was the Ducks worst line defensively. His physicality dropped off against Vegas. His defensive play has been a concern, even in junior. What if he doesn't improve his defensive reads and coverage? There is no guarantee he will. Plus, as Marner turned his fortunes around when leaving the poorly constructed core in Toronto, maybe the same happens for Nylander. As you said, and I have a swell before, pure talent, it's hard to match what Willy is capable of doing. Teams may not want to let guys like Sennecke go, but teams would also line up to get talent like Nylander.
22 May 2026 17:33:30
There is still so much talk going on about how well Marner is doing in the playoffs and it's a Toronto thing. Things like - there wasn't enough bottom 6 support in Toronto. The fan and media pressure is too much etc. The "see it wasn't Marner" narrative is running wild.
The one thing that isn't mentioned (at least I haven't heard it) is simply that the Vegas stars show up and up their game in the playoffs and Toronto's didn't. This isn't a knock on how well Marner is playing, he is playing well. His first 5 games though, he wasn't very noticeable, despite claims of he is playing great defensively so he's still playing great.
His name is now mentioned because of the point totals he is putting up through the offence provided, not the defensive game. From my point of view, the others picked up for Marner offensively in the first 5 games which allowed him to relax a bit and just play the game. That never happened in Toronto. Marner deserves credit for sure, but it's not a Toronto, the city thing, is was from Toronto having stars that don't want to play a hard game. In Vegas they will, and they get the results because of it.
Agree0Disagree0
22 May 2026 17:08:16
I think a big part is the competition he is playing against.
I don't mean just the quality of teams (Utah & Anaheim), but also the fact he's playing on their second line and not get the hardest match ups.
Agree0Disagree0
22 May 2026 19:44:40
No sense beating a dead horse. He doesn't play for us anymore. He is in a good place mentally and physically on and off the ice. We just need to close the book and worry about where our current roster is heading.
Agree0Disagree0
22 May 2026 21:50:37
Tags. Lower quality of competition would help.
Suffering. The horse isn't dead, it is talked about in the media daily. Even Vegas players, coaches and players from other teams put their two cents in. This post is about the Leafs roster though. That's my point. It's not the city, the fans, the media, it is about having built the team around too many support style stars.
Seldom do they impose their will on the other team. They wait for someone else to do that. It's hard to out skill someone with your face against the glass.
Let me ask you then, do you believe in the Leafs stars? (Matthews, Nylander).
Agree0Disagree0
22 May 2026 23:48:38
In regards to your question about Nylander and Matthews? No! I know everyone talks about retooling or trading them and rebuilding. To be honest years ago I could see Matthews becoming more and more a playing on the perimeter player, moreso when playoffs arrived. Nylander might be one of the most talented players to play the game for sheer skill in the last couple of decades for the insane things he can do with his speed and his hands. But he doesn't bring it consistently. In the last couple of years I have become completely open to trading both of them. Matthews stock has dropped in the past couple of years from where it was but even coming back from injury a team will offer a very good player and a good prospect and a 1st round pick. Nylander's stock has probably risen actually as his point per game production as gone up. So he would probably bring a good player and a couple of good prospects and a 1st if packaged with a lesser player.
Truthfully the return and the possibility of then using one of the better prospects and 1 if not 2 of the draft picks, puts us actually not in a rebuild as some would think. It would be more about adding 3 good players with more balance to replace the 2 big names that have also come to the end of the line with the failed Shanaplan.
I was watching the Canada game the other day at the World Championships and my Son in Law who is actually a Ottawa fan called me and said " Obviously a fantasy question but if you had a chance to Give up Nylander and Matthews and get 3 Dylan Holloways that could bang and score would you do it? " I didn't hesitate at all. I said "In a Heart Beat" That's the type of forwards we need. Big and strong but willing to give and take a hit, that every defencemen going into the corner knows they are going to get hit from that forward when he is on the ice.
Agree1Disagree0
23 May 2026 12:58:23
I would say you agree then that the 2 stars left are not the 2 that will lead to a Cup. The reason I posted what I did, because if this is true, and I believe it is, then moving forward the Leafs should be looking at moving them and building the team with new leaders instead of retooling around those 2.
Agree0Disagree0
23 May 2026 14:21:34
We are on the same page sir.
Agree0Disagree0
23 May 2026 15:45:05
Marner is not here anymore
Why are we still talking about him?
Move on already.
Agree0Disagree0
23 May 2026 16:39:33
Great post and comments, gentlemen. For what it’s worth I am on board with rebuilding and moving off them two as well. These young kids these days are coming in NHL ready and making immediate impacts. Get a young package now for them two, get some Vets in free agency for them to learn from.
Bring back Bobby McMann and let the rebuild begin. But before anyone, they need to find a trade for Reilly. He and Nylander would be my first two trades. Matthews and Stolarz to follow.
Agree0Disagree0
23 May 2026 17:28:17
Golftown. I explained the reason for the post as it was in regards to what Toronto should do with Matthews and Nylander if they aren't the type of players to lead. Marner, although the point leader for Vegas (only by 1 now), is not the only producer. The other Vegas stars have also played well and pick it up when Marner doesn't produce. Marner has 1 point in the 2 conference final games. Who has lead in the conference final so far - Eichel, Barbashev, Dorofeyev. Howden has 11 points. Theodore has 9 from the D.
Marner leaving and having success elsewhere shows as a group of stars, the Leafs were too flawed together. This should help more realize what some have been saying for a while, it wasn't the right formula. For me, it is move them now while they still have high value. It is not as much about Marner as it is about confirming Matthews, Nylander and Marner weren't the right mix, so let's move on and find the right mix instead of continuing the insanity. Retool, rebuild, remix, what ever you want to call it.
20 May 2026 05:04:23
Has anyone maybe considered that the Leafs might....just might...keep first overall and take Chase Reid first overall?
Solves their biggest need...and what Matthews asked management for when the season ended. A puck moving, PP quarterback, minute eating, right hand s*** defenseman! Not saying that they are going to pass on McKenna but might it make more sense for the direction of the team? Especially if they are going to "retool" instead of rebuild and they already have a bunch of wingers.
Agree0Disagree0
20 May 2026 18:54:15
Chase Reid is very much a gamble pick. He didn’t put up great numbers and his game on the defensive end needs work so taking him at 1 would be a tough sell…
Agree0Disagree0
20 May 2026 20:38:01
Yeah, I agree with Goat2.0. Reid really did not great at end of season and the playoffs. I expected more. I guess if someone thought high enough of him that they want him above everyone else. They could swap that pick and still get him along with either a player asset or a draft asset.
Agree1Disagree0
20 May 2026 22:50:15
Not saying that none of them become a top pairing Dman, but reading and watching this defense crop, it just doesn't look like any of them will become a legitimate 1st pairing Dmen. So, I personally would not use the 1stOA on any of them.
For me, it's pretty much 100% McKenna.
Agree0Disagree0
22 May 2026 21:51:50
There is no absolute stand out above the rest D. Take the best player, McKenna.
14 May 2026 13:22:27
So with Charlie Coyle at his age signing the 6 x $6m, does this throw a wrench into Pittsburgh's plans? Word is he wanted to stay in Pittsburgh and they were playing a bit of a waiting game and hoped to keep him but at a hometown discount for a couple years $4.5m up to $5m was bandied about. He also expressed interest in playing somewhere else depending how negotiations went.
With Coyle scoring 58 points in 82 games and Malkin scoring 61 points in only 56 games, if Pittsburgh doesn’t sign him, I would offer 2 years @ $6.75 per year. Then we have Matthew’s, Malkin and Tavares down the middle while we groom a few Centremen. Couldn’t hurt to have that experience and skillset.
Agree0Disagree0
14 May 2026 14:10:47
???? How would Pitt want to keep Coyle when he never played for them and how did he want to stay on a team he never played for? And how does him re-signing with CLB put a wrench in Pitts' plans?
Agree0Disagree0
14 May 2026 14:46:03
I had typed Malkin and the system changed it to “he” which obviously makes no sense. I had also posted it to rumours side but it ended up here. It says the site has the right to alter text and this has happened in the past a few times. I wish they would allow to do editing.
Agree0Disagree0
14 May 2026 14:47:38
Basically, with Coyle signing higher end, if Pittsburgh wants Malkin at the discount, I think it messed up Pittsburgh's plans.
Agree0Disagree0
14 May 2026 15:57:33
Got it, that makes more sense. With all Pitts cap space and so many players already signed, I think they can pay Malkin even $7M per for 2 years and still do whatever they want otherwise. They have $42M this year and a projected $87M the next year.
Agree0Disagree0
14 May 2026 23:47:42
It sounds though from Dubas end of the season conference the other day he is keeping spending of that cap tight.
He said: utilizing massive space simply because it is available is a "false flag" that can hinder long-term flexibility.
Cap Strategy: Dubas suggested he is cautious of overspending in a thin free-agent market and aims to avoid long-term deals for players in their 30s.
Focus on Youth/Assets: He plans to use cap space to acquire young players or take on contracts in exchange for assets.
Future Focus: The team is prioritizing accumulating draft capital and young talent to improve from the current roster.
Word is he wants Mantha back so he will be upping the salary there, he Defintely is going to re-sign Chinakov and he wants to Keep Ryan Shea so will have to up the ante there too.
None will be mind blowing contracts but could hit the $10,000,000 increase between the 3 of them. He also has no goalies under contract and wants to address that as well which depending on how he does it via trade or Possibly wooing Bobrovsky the budget is going to be in the $9 to $10 million range for a Tandem if not a little more.
Im not saying that saving Money on Malkin for hometown discount would be complete disaster if it didn't happen. But I think Dubas is trying to save every penny he can because I get the feeling he is loading up for a trade that will be a big one, and he might need the extra money for whoever he will be bringing in. The Coyle signing did though set a bit of a level on the Salary Barometer. I'm sure Tuch's agent is rubbing his hands in glee.
Agree0Disagree0
15 May 2026 13:45:27
I am trying to grasp what apparently Dubas plan is, on one hand;
"Cap Strategy: Dubas suggested he is cautious of overspending in a thin free-agent market and aims to avoid long-term deals for players in their 30s.
Focus on Youth/Assets: He plans to use cap space to acquire young players or take on contracts in exchange for assets."
Taking on contracts to get assets would typically be taking on contracts of players who aren't young or worth their money.
On the other hand, he also wants to re-sign Shea who is 29, Mantha 31 and possibly Bobrovsky at 37? Only younger player mentioned was definitely re-signing the 25 year old Chinakhov. That would fill up most of the roster spots they currently have available. Seems like a contradiction to what he said. Then again, it is Dubas, and he likes to say a lot of things.
Agree0Disagree0
15 May 2026 15:21:50
I will add, apparently he also wanted the 37 year old Malkin back on a home town discount.
Agree0Disagree0
15 May 2026 21:40:08
Yeah I think Dubas is throwing up a bit of a smoke screen on a few things. He is very sly.... I expect him to drop a bombshell trade if not just before the Draft on the actually Draft day.
They have a ton of top prospects in their system. So they could go that route. They also have all their draft picks in order should Dubas pull the trigger on a Jason Robertson Offer Sheet.
Agree0Disagree0
17 May 2026 18:55:27
Dubas being Dubas.
Still trying to prove to the world that he is the smartest executive in all of sports, not just hockey…
Still glad he’s gone…
Just sayin’.
13 May 2026 10:22:55
Solid ideas. If I was the GM, I’d probably be fine with all of them. Coyle’s obviously off the market now, though. Fun to toss around different scenarios and ideas.
My choice is Stenberg and Chase Reid but it's ok if Leafs draft McKenna and Reid.
12 May 2026 23:30:20
Was listening to Jonas Siegels podcast this morning where they had Scott Wheeler on to talk about McKenna, Wheeler had so good insight on the top draft options this year.
What stood out to me was what Wheeler had to say. He said the top choice is McKenna and always has been. He said McKenna may not have the immediate impact most want (he referred to Jack Hughes). He stated McKenna comparables at the high end could be the likes of Patrick Kane or Kucherov but on the low end Panarin.
He also stated Stenberg maybe the more NHL ready prospect but long term may not be the better player long term.
They also brought up Reid and he basically said he has number 1 potential but he’s not gonna be a game breaker.
I went and looked at Matthews stats compared to McKennas in their draft years and I know when Matthews was drafted a lot was said of Laine and that he may have been the better option and I can’t help but think this draft could play out the same way when the Leafs take the right guy in McKenna 1st overall
Agree0Disagree0
13 May 2026 22:28:28
I sure hope they take McKenna and I think that would be the right choice.