Leafs Trade Rumors

 

Use our rumours form to send us leafs trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)
 
Text Size Adjuster: 18px

Site last updated: 11:50:01

28 Apr 2026 08:45:26
Toronto Maple Leafs have acquired forward Andrew Mangiapane from the Chicago Blackhawks in exchange for goaltebder Anthony Stolarz.

As part of the deal, Chicago will retain 25% of Mangiapane’s salary.

Toronto does not sign Nick
Robertson. Both are smaller but different types of players, and Mangiapane is more useful in the physical game and overall play than Nick. In the third line role Mangiapane would fit better than N. Robertson.

If Mangiapane has a strong final year of his contract, then just hand him an extension. Toronto would no longer need Stolarz.

So pull the trigger.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

28 Apr 2026 02:02:24
Maybe try a little retool for fun?

To Leafs: E. Karlsson, Rust, 2nd 2027, 3rd 2026

To Pens: Nylander, Reilly

FA pickups:
Malkin - 1 X 4M
McMann 4 X 5M
Greer 2 X 2M
Stanley 3 X 2.2M
Coyle 2 X 6M

Knies Matthews Malkin
Cowan JT Rust
McMann Coyle Robertson
Greer Groulx Domi

OEL Karlsson
McCabe Tanev
Carlo Danford
Stanley

If it doesn’t work out trade them for draft picks/ prospects and start the rebuild.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

28 Apr 2026 02:04:57
Laughable

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Apr 2026 10:48:26
Leafs have zero interest in this.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 19:17:00
Tor: Nylander, Rielly, Quillan 3rd

Club: Marchenko, Werenski.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

27 Apr 2026 19:38:43
I like it although I think Columbus might want our First in 2027. We cog from Colorado to make it fly rather than that 3rd.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Apr 2026 00:08:50
Can’t imagine Columbus even considering such a trade.
Nylander’s extremely casual attitude towards the game does not fit, in any way, with Bowness’s complaint about Columbus players not “hating to lose” enough.
People also tend to forget that Nylander will be turning 30 next week.


His prime is coming to an end.
I definitely agree that Leafs should trade him, I simply don’t see his fit in Columbus, particularly for that substantial a return.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 18:17:14
Trade idea (just for discussion, I know cap doesn’t fully work here) :

To Columbus:


William Nylander and Alex "alex" Nylander


The Toronto

Boone Jenner

Conor Garland

Kirill Marchenko

Miikael Pyyhtiä


From the Toronto perspective, this would be a major shake-up of the core, but it would bring in a lot of useful pieces.
Jenner would likely step into the 2C role behind Matthews and take some of the defensive matchup load. He brings leadership, two-way reliability, and physicality.

Garland would be a strong fit in a 3rd line scoring/ transition role, adding speed and puck skill.

Marchenko is the KEY piece coming back. He’s already developed into a legit top-six wnger, and while he’s currently more of a second-line winger, there’s still top- line potential in his game within 1–2 years if his development continues. He would have the chance to eventually step into a top-line RW role in Toronto.

Pyyhtiä would be a high-motor depth addition for the 4th line, bringing energy, forechecking and versatility.
Yes yes, Toronto would be losing a true elite 1st-line winger in Nylander, and there’s no direct 1-for-1 replacement in the deal. But the hope would be that Marchenko develops into that type of player over time.
Believe Kirill M.

Also, from a “human side” angle, the Nylander brothers being together in Columbus could be a factor in terms of comfort and fit, even if that obviously isn’t the main driver of NHL trades.
Cap-wise it’s not perfectly balanced, and I know that’s a small issue.
It’s a risky move for Toronto, but the idea is to redistribute the value across multiple useful pieces, while betting on Marchenko’s upside to grow into a top-line role.
High risk, high reward type of deal.

So deal or not deal.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

27 Apr 2026 19:11:03
Boone Jenner is a UFA.

Agree1 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 19:22:32
I was just going to mention that too Hrenklin, as I believe you had pointed out in a earlier post. And I had forgot about. I like Boone Jenner and think he has been a great player for a long time. But we are in trouble if he or JT are our #2 Centre next year.

I would not mind one of them playing the others wing with a good young guy on the other wing on the 3rd line for another year during a transition stage. But not the 2nd line.

Agree1 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 19:35:04
That said, Nylander for the remaining package doesn't even get a look at from the Leafs. Plus the Leafs cannot trade his brother. His brother is under contract to the Marlies not to the Leafs under an NHL contract.

At the end of the Marlies season he is a UFA.

Thisisit must have known this though from his professional scout friend and the multitude of Marlies games he attended this year.

Agree2 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 03:54:19
Tor makes trade with NJ. NJ needs offence and Tor needs defence.

Tor- Nylander
NJ - Nemec, Silayev

Nylander waives to go play for Keefe again and have Hughes as a linemate. Tor gets a puck moving d-man who is a threat on the powerplay and a big prospect.

Move Reilly to a team that will take him or move him to Nylanders spot on offence.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

26 Apr 2026 23:10:45
Pretty nasty trade idea I’ve been thinking about.

Toronto Maple Leafs end up with Josh Norris as their 2C, and Jack Quinn skating on the RW in the second line.

Meanwhile, Buffalo Sabres get William Nylander on their first line right wing, yeah, the same guy who “doesn’t want to leave Toronto”.

And Toronto still gets a 1st-round pick on top of that, either in 2026 or 2027 (preferably 2026).



Honestly, it’s a pretty aggressive move, but the Leafs’ roster would look way more balanced right out of the gate.

Got a feeling one of these three, William Nylander, Matthew Knies, or Easton Cowan is getting moved before the season starts. And if that happens, Toronto might actually come out of it with a much more logical lineup.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

26 Apr 2026 23:24:57
Jack Quinn, I think has a great future in the NHL and with another player like Doan or McLeod or Benson, I do that deal. But Josh Friggen Norris? The most injured man in the NHL... no way. To much of a risk.

Agree2 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 00:01:17
When healthy he’s worth it, but the injury risk makes the contract a gamble.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 00:05:06
Sometimes even Josh’s bad luck has to end. Otherwise, the guy will be playing more than 70 games at a point-per-game pace in the upcoming season...Benson is nice but no thanks.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 01:42:24
It has nothing to do with contract risk. It has everything to do with giving up potentially only ending up with one healthy player and a first.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 12:59:53
Neither Knies or Cowan will be traded.

Agree2 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 20:25:25
Reilly 2.5 million retained
Robertson
To Sharks
2026 1st round
To Leafs.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

28 Apr 2026 00:13:03
“I’ve got dreams, dreams to remember”.
A 1st for Rielly?
The Leafs may have to give up a sweetener to get rid of the next 4 years of his contract.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Apr 2026 01:25:33
Hence the 2.5 million retained and Robertson.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 10:57:53
Small trade idea (. ) (. )

Toronto receives, Jake Furlong and a 3rd-round pick
Chicago receives: Anthony Stolarz

Toronto adds a young defensive prospect in Furlong along with a mid-round pick, while Chicago gets an NHL-ready goalie in Stolarzz who can immediately help stabilize their goaltending depth.

Feels like a reasonable hockey trade where Chicago gets stability in net, and Toronto adds a future piece plus a draft asset.

If Tanev gets healthy, a Furlong, Tanev third pairing could be pretty interesting. Furlong would handle the puck-moving side and good hockey iq, good first pass, PP2, while Tanev provides the defensive stability and insurance.
And it would also add more offensive upside to the third pairing with Jake Furlong. There’s still work to do in his defensive game, and he’s not particularly physical.


Goalies Woll, Hildebeast

Trade Benoit to 3round pick another team.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

26 Apr 2026 14:23:00
First off. The way things are with Stolarz, one of the few teams in the NHL who might take him as a single player in a trade from Toronto would be Florida because of their history with him. Might be one or two others, but most trades involving him will be his as a throw in with us getting rid of cap and hoping his throw in gets us whoever we are after with other parts we are trading.



The thing that really gets me is that you are trying to get Furlong and already you have him pencilled in with Tanev? What about our own Noah Chadwick, who had a better season than Furlong?

Agree4 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 18:34:32
Unfortunately I think we still need him here unless another experienced goalie comes back in return.

Agree1 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 00:09:27
Chadwick play NHL maby season 2028+2029 so... Not yet next season.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 01:44:40
How many Marlies games did you go to this year?

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 10:25:00
Little less 40 games I see when Marlies play. Next season it's not Chadwick time to NHL yet.
Good future 2nd D line player.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Apr 2026 00:16:58
Stolarz has to go because Hildeby will have to be put on waivers to be sent down to the AHL next season.
The Leafs will have the choice of putting Hildeby on waivers and immediately losing him or be forced to carry 3 goaltenders.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 07:54:06
Stolarz Robertson Benoit to Penguins
McGroarty Graves 2nd 2026 2nd 2027 to Leafs

Graves is the salary dump here

A line of
McGroarty Tavares Cowan looks nice to me

Rielly Domi 2nd 2027 from Pens to Sharks
Musty Havelid to Leafs

Joshua to Kraken
4th 2026 to Leafs

Carlo to Ducks
Warren 3rd 2026 to Leafs

Draft Carels 5th overall

Sign free agents
Tuch
Roslovic
Trouba
Soucy

Believable0 Unbelievable0

26 Apr 2026 19:32:47
I’d be good with just dumping salary and signing those guys.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 22:52:18
Who's Salary in Particular and signing which guys specific guys? There are a lot of names in that post.

Agree0 Disagree0

28 Apr 2026 00:20:35
Tuch is from the Buffalo area and will almost certainly resign with the Sabres.
A big No to Roslovic, Trouba and Soucy.
No more signing 30+ years old players who want 3, 4 & 5 year contracts.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 00:30:09
Toronto would get Jonatan Berggren for a 3th and a 4th-round pick and put him straight on Tavares' line to bring some agility and mobility. Oh man, it'd be awesome to see J. Berggren in a Leafs jersey.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

26 Apr 2026 17:25:09
OK I'll bite... What makes this guy so awesome to put him straight on Tavares line and give up 2 draft picks. When St. Louis got him for nothing in December when Detroit thought enough of him to put him on waivers?

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 23:34:05
-----_---------+_++++++++----------------_---------_---_-----
Jonatan Berggren is clearly a skilled, highly creative player with excellent offensive instincts. If he can unlock his full potential, he’d be a great fit on a second line wing in Toronto Maple Leafs, and he definitely has something to offer on the power play thanks to his skill set. Low risk high reward.

Berggren is pretty underrated around the NHL, but it wouldn’t surprise me at all if he turns into a 50–60 point playmaker.

He’s still figuring out his ideal role and linemates so everything really clicks.

Definitely a name to remember... I think he’s still going to show just how good of a top-6 player he can become.

I’d give Jonatan Berggren a 2 year deal at $1.5 million per season. Honestly, something like that would probably be pretty fair.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 02:26:47
This sounds either cut and paste or AI compared to most of your normal responses.

Agree2 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 10:39:10
I’m Russian and my English isn't very strong, so sometimes I use a translator to help me form sentences correctly. I travel around North America attending junior, AHL, NCAA, OHL, WHL and NHL games with a friend of mine who is also Russian and works as an NHL scout. He gets paid for it, so he’s a professional scout.

I hear a lot of rumors from him and often know which players he’s scouting at different games.

Some of the names I’ve mentioned here are players that Toronto is very interested in.

I also know that Toronto is more interested in Chase Reid than Verhoeff. If Toronto were to get, for example, the 3rd overall pick, Reid would likely be the choice if both players were still available. Verhoef has more areas that need development.

Agree1 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 10:49:33
Do you think that if Toronto could get Vincent Trocheck in a reasonable trade, they would do it? I can answer that myself, they would. Behind the scenes, they’re already thinking about how to bring Vincent to Toronto.

As you probably know, Toronto looking for a center, preferably a 2C. They’re also looking for 1–2 players for the right wing, and additional deptht for the third line.

The defense will be reshaped as well, and I’d expect around three players to be moved.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 18:54:35
Is your friend a Leafs scout?

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 00:04:21
The Trade
To Toronto: Cole Sillinger RFA, Mathieu Olivier
To Columbus: Max Domi + Nick Robertson RFA

And Toronto third line is
Joshua-Sillinger-Olivier. Sounds dangerous.
Toronto gives Cole Sillinger a 5-6 year deal at $5,5-6.2 million per year.

Toronto would acquire some puck skill in Jake Christiansen, and when physicality is needed, Benoit would play. When they don't need that much physical play, the more puck-moving Christiansen would play, meaning for example a 50/50 split on the 3rd defensive pair.

Toronto would give a 4th-round pick.
Jake hasn't put up many points in the NHL yet, but watching him play, you can definitely see he's an offensive and puck-moving defenseman. He just needs to reach his full potential. Maybe in Toronto.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

26 Apr 2026 00:28:40
I don’t get it? Why would you give Sillinger that kind of money?

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 00:37:40
Probably because he's going to get at least 6 million, so why not in Toronto? He's still a young player and his best years are ahead of him.

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 01:32:37
Well, he is from Columbus let them give him the $6 million. I'm not interested in him for that. His 5 seasons have been 31 points, 11 points, 32 points, 33 points and 33 points this year. I was following him earlier this year when he heated it up after the coaching change and they said he has found his groove and is going to have his career best year. They said that around the Olympic break. Then, he proceeded after the break to be pointless in 10 games, got 6 points in 3 games and then crapped the bed by ending off with 1 point in the last 13 games of the season.

To me that is not worth taking him on for $6 million. Sorry... my personal opinion. Heck if we are getting 33 points for that let's just keep Nick Robertson at his forecasted $2.3 million. He got 32 points not knowing from game to game what line he would be on.

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 04:23:56
I'm just trying to figure out why Columbus makes the trade. To me, Olivier more value than Domi. Sillinger more value than Robertson.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 11:08:43
Cole Sillinger’s value isn’t really measured in points. He plays tough minutes, can handle the defensive side of the game, and that’s something teams do pay for nowadays. He does the “quiet work” and is a reliable player overall, a coach can trust him even late in games when protecting a lead. I’d still expect his salary to end up around $5.5M. The cap is going up, and Toronto doesn’t really have a 3C unless they use Tavares there.

And as for Domi and Robertson being “too little” for those guys… maybe it’s actually just the right kind of hockey trade... not an overpay for either side, but something that fits both teams.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 14:52:21
It is a big overpay for Columbus. The Sillinger and Robertson to me is a saw off but a big overpay for the Leafs if they paid what you suggest. Olivier is a massive overpay for Domi. There is no-one in the League quite like him. Beyond a douby the Heavyweight champ of the league. But Scored 18 last year and 15 this year and had he not got hurt would have been 20 which would have put him 5 on the Leafs for goals.

Also led the league in how many times players on the other team Crapped their pants when even jokingly he would have lined up beside a guy and said "We are going to go as soon as that puck drops" lol lol lol.

Agree3 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 15:27:21
Thisisit. So, Sillinger is better than suffering says, but then you say it's a good trade because it's not an overpay for either side. You don't see any contradiction here?
Let me ask this. Do you believe Columbus would trade Olivier for Domi straight up and Sillinger for Robertson straight up?

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 16:39:32
So here is question for Thisisit. Give me rating on a scale of 1-10 for Sillinger Stankoven and Byfield and which 2 of the 3 would you like to see on the Leafs if you could have 2 of them??

Agree1 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 18:10:59
To me it seems Sillinger should easily have more value than Robertson. He's 2 years younger. Plays centre. Is given more defensive minutes but outpoints Robertson. He PK's. He will fight. Could be a solid 3C as he continues to grow.

Sillinger also has the size advantage.
Robertson is going on 25 and just hit his career high 32 points. He's not good defensively. He needs PP time to pad his point total. And he's small, but not overly elusive. How are they a wash?

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 23:11:54
Well for starters. Robertson gets bumped around a lot on the lines. I have no problem with him getting PP points. PP points aren't to pad anyone's stats; they are because you are good enough to be on the PP. Sillinger was last option on Columbus PK units. Yes he is two years younger and yes he outpointed him this year by one point. He fights, yes, but in the few fights he has had, he cheapshotted and had to answer the bell and did not fare well in the fights.

My point on vallue is this. Robertson is looking for $2M, maybe $2.2M, and Sillinger, the value being thrown around by Thisisit, is at least $6M, so for value.

As much as people hate on Robertson. If I can keep him at $2M and change and maybe he pans out more if given a specific line to stay with, great. If we have to package him he still has value. But I am not forking out $6M and maybe more for Sillinger. That is not good value. Compare him to Centres in the league earning in that range, even $5M, and tell me he is in the league of most of those guys as overall players.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 23:38:38
RLF
Yeah, you’re right, Columbus Blue Jackets would never agree to that. Mathieu Olivier is definitely a heavyweight.

Bit of a rushed idea, my bad. I wouldn’t make that trade myself either.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 23:43:16
Suffering19667

Sillinger and Byfield.

Sillinger 6,5, Stankoven 6 ja Byfield 7.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Apr 2026 23:48:38
RLF
They’re not even close to being equal. One is clearly more well-rounded, while the other just has the better shot. I’ll take the more versatile and useful player for the team every time.

That’s why Cole Sillinger still has the potential to become a high-end 3C somewhere in the NHL, preferably in Toronto Maple Leafs. Welcome Cole to Leafs.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 01:56:55
Ok I’m done. The fact you rate Stankoven as a 6 shows you for sure do not understand hockey players.

Agree4 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 16:01:47
Suffering, those are weak arguments and you know it. You have argued against your own points in other debates. You know I meant Robertson needs PP time to even get 25-30 points. Sillinger's points were almost all even strength this year. He was injured last year, but on pace for 41 points. The same season Robertson had 22 points and played 3 more games.
Sillinger averaged about 45 seconds of PK time per game and only on for 4 goals against. Hardly the last option. Ironic to point out when comparing the two players since Robertson is actually the last option for PK in Toronto. Sillinger has more takeaways and less giveaways than Robertson. More hits, more blocked shots.
You say Robertson is on the PP because he is good enough. He averaged over a minute of PP time per game and had 4 PP points. McMann had way less PP time and equaled him. Domi had the same amount of PP time and double the points. Sillinger: 2 NHL hat tricks. The goal scorer Robertson: 0.
As for the fights, he has had 6 as a 22 year old. How many guys do you think have had more? Who did he sucker punch exactly? He faired well in most of his scraps.

At least he will fight and you make it sound like some kind of negative. How many has Robertson had? 0. He had one in junior and got smoked.
Who cares what Thisisit says his contact will be. My simple statement was that Sillinger more value than Robertson. You said it's a wash. I never said he is worth $6M, you brought it into the conversation. Nor do I hate Robertson. Just because I don't think he is a 25-30 goal scorer and would rather move on doesn't mean I hate him. I would rather give that money to a different player.
By 24 years old, most consistent 25-30 goals have at least scored 20 by that time. Every Robertson supporter claims he doesn't get a fair shake. Too many line mates. Not enough opportunity. He's had 2 coaches now. Neither thought he is a top 6 player. He got more opportunity in the last 20 games. Had 4 goals and 2 assists for a 16 goal 8 assist season pace. That was his time with the trades and injuries to prove he deserves more next season and he did nothing to show he does.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 18:02:15
@RLF I was not saying I would not trade Robertson straight up for Sillinger for their existing salaries. I have stuck to my argument and opinion to the original post. He said $5.5 to 6.2 million for Sillinger and all along I have said that kind of money for him is not good value.

If you guys want to fork that king of money out for him, great. But I would rather trade for a multitude of other players who are much better in that same Salary range.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 18:31:58
Suffering1967
Yeah, I definitely rate Sillinger as a more complete two-way player than Stankoven overall, which is why I gave Stankoven a lower rating than Cole.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 18:42:08
*Great write-up, RLF*

I agree with what you said. Sillinger is honestly hard to project when it comes to his next contract, but he’s so versatile that you’re probably paying a premium of at least a million because of that.



I don’t hate Robertson either, it’s just that there doesn’t really seem to be a clear top-six role for him in Toronto, so I’d rather move on.

Agree0 Disagree0

27 Apr 2026 19:56:23
This comment about the Rantanen trade. According to Hurricanes GM Eric Tulsky, when Stankoven's name came up in trade discussions, several people in the Hurricanes' war room "practically jumped out of their chair" to make the deal, as he was the targeted player, not just a throw-in.

Rod Brind'Amour said at the time that while scouting Dallas, the coaching staff constantly noticed Stankoven.

"Who is that guy? Who is that guy? He's always around it," Brind'Amour said. "Obviously, we love that about him."

So I am pretty sure they don't share your assessment of Stankoven, as I am pretty sure Ottawa fans, of which my son-in-law is one, do not share your assessment either.

Agree4 Disagree0


Leafs Rumours 2


Leafs Rumours 3


Leafs Rumours 4


Leafs trade rumours 5


Cell phone only version of this site: https://mobile.leafs-rumours.com

 
Log In or Register to post
User
Pass