Leafs Trade Rumors

 

Use our rumours form to send us leafs trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)
 
Text Size Adjuster: 18px

Site last updated: 20:25:30 Site updated with larger posting forms, text size adjuster (just before the start of the posts) and dark mode / light mode (toggle top right).

02 Jan 2026 20:11:17
Stolarz skating again which is a good sign. Hearing analysts and reporters (Kyperos) say putting hildeby up as trade bait to get a dman but I would rather get rid of STOL who’s signed to a great aav and keep the younger guy. When he comes back and if he plays like he did last year or close to it which was stellar his value will be big for teams looking for upgrades.

To Tor
1st and 2nd 2026
To SJS
Stolarz
Or
To Tor
Sennecke
Luneau
2nd 2027
To Ana
Stolarz

I say forget the dman and grab picks and prospects for him. 2 teams in playoff spots with bad goaltending. Sure they would be willing to pay a good price for STOL with playoff experience and a cup in his resume.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

02 Jan 2026 19:17:27
Matthews trade scenario but I don’t think he’s going anywhere. But will happen in offseason.
To Tor
Johnson
Robertson rfa rights
1st 2027
2nd 2026
To Dal
Matthews
Cowan

The way I’m thinking is if Robertson signs a offer sheet which is very possible it will be over the $9.36mil cause he wants more than that, which activates 2 1st rd picks and 2nd and 3rd as comp. Now you’ve turned this trade into 3 1st 2 2nd and a 3rd. Plus u got Johnson. I know u give up Cowan in the deal with Matthews but comp seems well worth it.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

02 Jan 2026 18:44:01
Not a huge trade but maybe an impactful one.

Tor: maccelli 3rd
Lak: perry

Perry is 40 I realize that but you want to see a clutch player look at perry he’s done it his whole career. And if the leafs don’t Florida will.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

02 Jan 2026 18:02:41
No thanks. Maccelli is playing a lot better lately and showing what he brings offensively to a team in need. Not giving him up and a 3rd for 40yr old wash out.

Agree0 Disagree1

02 Jan 2026 19:14:09
wtf Blowhard? Really. Guy has played 38 crappy games and has 2 decent ones and you’re all on board with him now eh? What is this softy gonna do in playoffs besides nothing? I’d take Perry at 60 over Maccelli now. Remember it’s not just us, Utah sat him half the season last year for lack of consistency and also having a V*gin*. You guys wanna hold onto to all these pre Madonna’s go for it but stop complaining when they can’t make playoffs or when their too soft to win a playoff round.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jan 2026 13:13:19
tor: robertson, carlo, holinka

stl: faulk (1m retianed)

trying to make a fair trade with minimal assets sucks. but, we turn carlo into the dmen we hoped carlo would be. hes a natural RHD, defensive but offensive at the same time. id prefer getting parayko from st luois, but, hes much more costly.

st luois gets some retool peices that arent our bet, but arent terrible.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

02 Jan 2026 15:58:41
Faulk nixed a trade didn't he? Ssid he wouldn't leave if I recall.

If his trade protection expired then maybe, but he isn't high on my list anyway.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jan 2026 17:36:15
What the heck is the trade Faulk hasn’t been great since he left Carolina and you wanna give up Robertson Carlo and holinka that’s insane.

Agree1 Disagree0

02 Jan 2026 18:04:30
I like to wait and see when Carlo comes back how he plays b4 deciding to get rid of him. Too much for Faulk.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jan 2026 18:31:53
@LL - he currently has a 15 team NTC

@goat + fault is a well rounded dman. He's 10g 10a in 40g. Doesn't have much of an injury history. He's a solid top 4 the that compliments more offensive minded dmen. He's got a great first pass out of the zone. You should watch more teams regularly instead of just when they play the leafs.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Dec 2025 12:28:57
What about a trade with LA

Nylander and Domi
For
Byfield and Kuzmenko

Does anyone add?

Believable1 Unbelievable4

02 Jan 2026 18:05:01
Yes La.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Dec 2025 00:22:52
Like tags post
Knies would be tough to include in a trade

Dallas
Matthews
Robertson

Leafs
Wyatt J
Hemming
2nd 2026
1st 2027
Bourque

Believable0 Unbelievable6

02 Jan 2026 01:33:14
Why would Dallas make such a terrible trade.
So one sided favoring the Leafs.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jan 2026 16:51:28
Well one sided it may look now but! From what I’ve seen as of late from AM I’m not sure. Matthews is starting to appear healthy and dangerous again. 4 pts last night against Winnipeg! So, I’m NOT saying plan the parade or now keep him bc I still believe he’ll leave after his contract expires but if he keeps this up his trade value will skyrocket! Thank you 34! Nice parting gift to the fans!

Agree1 Disagree0

02 Jan 2026 18:09:44
Matthews catching fire and looked really good against a tough jets team that came to play last night. His value is going up as is all the leafs roster. I wouldn’t be making any moves until deadline. Matthews would be offseason regardless.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 16:30:34
This would obviously be an off-season deal and could be more realistic if Dallas sh*ts the bed again.

To Dallas
Matthews $14.25M/ 2yrs
Knies $7.75M/ 5yrs
2027 2nd

To Toronto
Johnston$8.4M/ 4yrs
Harley $10.587M/ 8yrs
Hemming ELC
2027 1st

Not sure if values make sense, but this would be a block buster for both teams.

Thoughts?

Believable1 Unbelievable4

30 Dec 2025 17:31:54
I think this trade just fixes one issue and creates another Harley is a great add but then you got to move someone else on the blueline and then your also adding a good young player but then your losing two pieces I’d rather keep knies and try a submit the trade without him in it.

Agree0 Disagree1

30 Dec 2025 17:37:40
I don't like the idea of moving Knies anywhere tbh.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 18:21:07
This is a tough one. The value back to the Leafs is quite good, but Knies is a guy I would want to build around. Rare commodity. I think we forget sometimes he is only 23. If Matthews was going, and this is the best offer, I wouldn't be thrilled, but I wouldn't be angry either.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 18:53:21
I understand most don't want to get rid of Knies (and I really don't either), but this return gives us that potential 1D, which Leafs haven't had in forever.
Johnston has a good potential to be a 1C, so we still replace the 1C positon as well (albeit with a lesser talent) .

Dallas still has a young 1D in Heiskanen, so this might be a trade that interests them as well. Something that may tip the scales for their Stanley Cup run.

@Goat we're gaining to star young pieces as well as losing 2 star pieces. It's pretty much roster player for roster players and then Leafs add a good prospect plus a 1st round pick.

Anyways, just looking at different targets.
Plus, Leafs can trade off some of their other Dmen (such as OEL at the TDL) . He would probably fetch a 1st.

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Dec 2025 13:46:58
Knies is going nowhere. Kid’s a beast signed to a great contract.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Dec 2025 15:54:14
@Blowhard24
Definitely, all trades aren't going to please or intrigue everyone, but I'm just trying to think out of the box and look at different targets as opposed to the same targets getting re-invented over and over.

BTW, we all love Knies, but you have to give to get. Plus his contract isn't great IMO, IT'S FAIR. It would have been great if signed for 8 years.

Agree0 Disagree1

01 Jan 2026 14:05:05
Still a NO to trading Knies even in 2026. It would have been like trading Wendel in his prime. It will deflate the heart out of team. I don’t get why people are taking the best all around heart forward in years (who we have been craving for) and just trading him because well Morgan Reilly sucks and we need to improve our puck moving D. Please just leave him out of the trades, the whole fan base would turn on Tre and he would be fired in less than a month.

Agree1 Disagree0

02 Jan 2026 16:56:12
No way to Trading Knies! He’s the future of this organization period! Maybe add Robertson and Cowboy. Does this come close to Matthews and Knies to Dallas? Or is there other pieces that should be involved added or subtracted?

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 14:26:53
Tor: macelli
Edm: mangiapane 800k retained.

Believable0 Unbelievable1

30 Dec 2025 15:43:42
You know what would be nice is some original thought on these posts if I want to see proposed trades by reporters or analyst I’ll read them in the articles they write. I come here to read thinking outside the box but keep getting the same 💩 I read in articles. Then told my posts are ridiculous cause I don’t follow the analyst or reporters outlooks or predictions.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 17:52:44
I have no issue with someone posting a deal they saw somewhere else. I would prefer they note it is something they saw, but why does it matter where they got the idea?
Some of your trades blowhard are just slight retools of what other people on here have already posted. Nor are people saying your posts are ridiculous because they don't follow analysts or reporters. They say they are ridiculous because they all heavily favour the Leafs because you don't put much value on other teams players.

Take your Utah trade you listed.
Guenther (9 OA pick) is a 22 year old on pace for 35 goals and 65 points. Close to what Matthews had as a 21 year old (37/ 73). Guenther had 27/ 33 for 60 as a 21 year old. That's not a massive difference.
Crouse-Big, physical 30-40 pt two way vet forward
Iginla- (6 OA pick)19 year old on a 100 pt pace in junior. Looks like a top 6 forward in the making.
Lamoureux- (29 OA pick)21 year old 6'7" good skating right shot D who has already played some in the NHL. Top 4 D trending.
2026 1st

What does Utah get. Matthews, (who at the moment) is not a top 5 player in the world anymore. He's on pace for just over 30 goals and 60 points. Less than last year. Makes $13.25M. You add Robertson for value. On pace for 17 goals and 35 points. Guenther and Crouse alone may equal Robertson's and Matthews production this year. And Utah is supposed to add Iginla, Lamoureux and another 1st. When Matthews was scoring 50+, that would still be a decent haul. He hasn't done that in 2 seasons now.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 18:07:55
Funny, I have young kids and don't really pay attention to outside posts just check this site once or twice a day. Pretty sure my last post was a Matthews to phili for 2 1sts Drysdale and grebenkin and got told to make more realistic trades, so what can ya do.

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Dec 2025 00:04:55
Lol
Blowhard your trade posts are hilarious because anyone who follows hockey knows what you are posting is lunacy.

Agree0 Disagree1

31 Dec 2025 13:40:33
Ok so you are saying guenther is going to lead the league in goals scored from now until age 28? Cause that’s what Matthews has done. FYI Matthews is averaging the same points per game as guenther at this moment. Crouse has less points then Robertson and is 4yrs older with dbl the cap hit with no RFA rights he’s a FA. These things are all factors in my trade. U take one of iginla or lamaureux out but not the picks and guenther and Crouse definitely not.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Dec 2025 18:13:43
Inhale deeply, exhale extremely loudly.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jan 2026 01:37:15
Blowhard24, your posts often don’t follow reason!

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 13:48:44
To tor
Guenther
Crouse
Iginla
Lamoureux
1st 2026

To Utah
Matthews
Robertson

Believable0 Unbelievable5

02 Jan 2026 01:37:57
Ridiculous!
Matthews isn’t even a top 20 player at the moment.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 13:38:23
To tor
1st 2026
1st 2027
Wright
Obrien
Beniers

To Sea
Matthews
Robertson

Kraken 2pts out of wild card spot with games in hand on both teams occupying those spots. Also has multiple 1st rd picks in each year. Non tax state for fashion boy keeps more money.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

30 Dec 2025 17:10:27
SEA doesn't make this trade because it simply guts them down the middle by trading two centres who are both young. So they don't move both Beniers and Wright.

If you can get Wright, O'Brien, and 2 1st round picks for Matthews and Roberston, you probably want to make this deal if you're TOR. I still don't know if SEA wants to do it, as they have a lot of youth and should probably just wait another year to see what they have.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 17:59:06
Because Beniers and Wright have never really taken off yet and became top point producers, if O'Brien was removed, this may be close.

Agree2 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 18:30:12
@RLF

Yeah, if one of those three SEA players is removed from the proposal, then it may be close.

For SEA, since O'Brien isn't quite NHL ready, and since Matthews is a Centre and the deal shifts them to 'win-now', doesn't parting with O'Brien in the deal, and also one of SEA's young centers make more sense than sending both center out?

I also wonder if Robertson's truly necessary in this hyptothical. If Chinakhov could fetch a 2nd and 3rd yesterday, then Robertson should be able to get the Leafs something very similar, no?

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Dec 2025 00:05:37
French. Depends on their projection of O'Brien compared to Beniers and Wright. If they see O'Brien as a true top 6 centre, then moving the other 2 would make sense.

Agree2 Disagree0

31 Dec 2025 13:30:56
I would want obrien over wright if I was leafs. Beniers there more for cap reasons and an immediate replacement for Matthews.

Agree1 Disagree0

01 Jan 2026 01:23:23
If O’Brien is taken out TML should NOT make the trade.
You guys have all lost faith in Matthews.

Agree0 Disagree0

02 Jan 2026 17:06:19
@FrensU Chinakov got a 2nd and 3rd Round picks crazy. It is market value tho I guess but! If Nicky Bobby keeps playing the way he is trending he will get a larger return I think and tbh other than the size difference between Chin and Robby I think NR is looking like a better player in general. More of what and why the Leafs have kept him around to develop into, while also maximizing their return. Cause he isn’t in the long term future I don’t believe.

Agree0 Disagree0

29 Dec 2025 23:52:12
Some mock trades that are kinda go for it moves

Tor: domi, maccelli rights to topi niemela
Nsh: marchessault bunting (50%)

Or

Tor: domi
Min: Hartman

First trade is really the one I wouldn't Mind leafs get deeper in their top 6 and move two guys that just haven't fit there is incentive for Barry to make this deal he gets out of a contract that isn't good and he's getting something for bunting who likely isn't resigning only hold up would be domi would have to waive

Second trade same kinda thing two players who make the same amount need new teams

Believable2 Unbelievable2

30 Dec 2025 13:25:03
Leafs add in Preds trade. Domi has zero trade value.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Dec 2025 17:14:42
If anything, MIN needs another Center.

Agree0 Disagree0


Leafs Rumours 2


Leafs Rumours 3


Leafs Rumours 4


Leafs trade rumours 5


Cell phone only version of this site: https://mobile.leafs-rumours.com

 
Log In or Register to post
User
Pass