06 Jul 2016 01:11:07
Det.- LW JVR

Tor. - LW T.Tatar + 3rd 2017
which would be then returned for Babcock trade

1.) 06 Jul 2016
06 Jul 2016 17:56:53
Babcock trade? Dafuq are you talking about?

2.) 07 Jul 2016
06 Jul 2016 22:46:32
So what do the leafs gain here a lesser player and a low pick?

3.) 07 Jul 2016
07 Jul 2016 01:12:18
Coaches can't be traded LOL

4.) 07 Jul 2016
07 Jul 2016 07:19:00
He means we owe Detroit a third round pick back for signing Babs . and that pick has to be our own third rounder and since we deffered it in 2015 and 2016 that means our own third rounder next year belongs to Detroit. I get it the trade buy I'm not sure I'm sold on TatAR but not a bad proposal

5.) 08 Jul 2016
08 Jul 2016 02:27:10
@ferm.

Not enough for JVR.

Tator is intriguing seeing as he was a 60th pick and has done fairly well. He is only 2 years younger than JVR, so he doesn't represent the return you would want for JVR. Someone 23 or less would be preferable; or at least a RH Dman that the Leafs need.

But he and a 3rd is not enough for JVR. You need to up the pick or add a prospect.

Question: Why is everyone fixated on getting the 3rd. rounder back.

It's not likely to be used in an offer sheet anyway, just like it hasn't been for a long time now; only 13 unmatched offer sheets out of 35 player accepted offer sheets, in 29 YEARS.

It's just too rare to be part of a planned strategy.

JVR is worth a player and a 1st rounder.

6.) 08 Jul 2016
08 Jul 2016 08:30:46
Hey lab. I don't disagree with that at all. I just think if we're trading JVR we should put him in a package to get a right shot dman to play with Riles that's all.