27 Mar 2026 02:00:54
To San Jose
Matthews
Carlo
Benoit
Robertson
To Leafs
Misa
Musty
1st 2026
1st 2027
Lund
To Ducks
Rielly
Nylander
To Leafs
McTavish
Sennecke
Luneau
To whomever has 1st overall pick this year
Both 1sts from above San Jose trade
Woll
Danford
Draft Mckenna
Sign Trouba Andersson Oleksiak
12 forwards mix and match
Mckenna Misa Sennecke
Knies Tavares Cowan
Musty McTavish Valis
Lorentz Domi Joshua
6 dmen
OEL Trouba
McCabe Andersson
Oleksiak Luneau
Stolarz. Hildeby.
1.) 27 Mar 2026
27 Mar 2026 17:24:33
So in these trades to San Jose and to Anaheim. Who from the Leafs is worth what parts from those teams? Please break it down. Very curious.
2.) 27 Mar 2026
27 Mar 2026 19:21:45
Don’t want McTavish. If I’m giving up Nylander it has to be Gauthier or Carlsson coming back.
3.) 28 Mar 2026
28 Mar 2026 00:09:27
I personally like the trades. Not sure I’d give up Woll, Danford and 2-1sts for McKenna’s. I’d do Woll, a 1st and a 2nd for that pick. But I like the roster. Good mix of grit and skill with some toughness.
@champ If anyone denies that deal it’s ANH because Sennecke is gonna be a stud.
4.) 28 Mar 2026
28 Mar 2026 12:25:08
Hey Clarky!!!!! Long time no post. Hope all is well. Missed seeing your posts.
I agree with you on the Anaheim deal. They are not giving up Sennecke and they are certainly not giving up either Karlsson or Gauthier. They have a good solid nucleus there and need minor tweaks, not a major shakeup.
If the end goal in all this was to land McKenna I agree with the suggested end result being an overpay.
Why would you give up either of those first to begin with. San Jose has been falling and could easily land in the top 5 or higher in this year's draft.
As an aside... I watched the Penn State final game last night. I have never been 100% sold on McKenna as the overall #1 anyway but I am sure more than a few scouts did not file positive reports on his performance after that game.
5.) 28 Mar 2026
28 Mar 2026 12:59:00
Champ you are delusional
You think the ducks ? would give up both cutter and Beckett in the same trade for nylander woll?
Get a grip dude
6.) 28 Mar 2026
28 Mar 2026 13:56:40
Take out Sennecke. Put in Luneau then. That solves 2 issues for Leafs. Gauthier or Carlsson C2 and Luneau RD.
7.) 28 Mar 2026
28 Mar 2026 14:58:41
@suffering Thank you! I feel like most trades have been done. All I want to say is how right I was about Bobby McMann, I said wouldn’t move him. Berube isn’t playing him in the right situations. Once another team does, it will be another Hyman gone.
Super frustrating. Can’t lose guys like that
@Champ Cutter and Leo are arguably already more complete players and much younger. Plus I bet neither one is gonna be making close to 11.5M in their next contract. Ducks would say no.
8.) 28 Mar 2026
28 Mar 2026 15:38:20
Yeah. I never said I disliked McMann. It just became apparent they weren't going to sign him. The sad part is we got a 4th and a 2nd but word has it Seattle before the Olympics had offered a 1st and the Leafs thought they could get a 1st and a prospect and held off.
If we had to let him go. The 1st would have cushioned things more for sure. Edmonton of course offered a 1st down the road and Mangianpane (Or as my buddy says "Panarin is the Breadman Mangianpane is the Expired Date Breadman").
9.) 31 Mar 2026
31 Mar 2026 15:50:15
You don’t think Gauthier or Carlsson are getting 11.5m?? If they r signing long term like Cooley they r for sure hitting that number or very close. Especially with a rising cap. They r future C1 and C2, if Ducks want to keep them both they will have to pony up.
10.) 01 Apr 2026
01 Apr 2026 18:55:40
Matthews alone gets that haul why add the rest?
11.) 02 Apr 2026
01 Apr 2026 23:17:16
I agree with Clarky! I think Carlsson will be 10 to 10.5 and Gauthier 9.5.
12.) 02 Apr 2026
02 Apr 2026 15:25:02
Of course you agree with Clarky that’s just to go against me. Typical. Gauthier and Carlsson putting up way better numbers than Colley neither one is going to make less than him. Delusional if u think so. Not even on a bridge deal.
13.) 03 Apr 2026
03 Apr 2026 00:02:15
Just to go against you? Ckarky and I don't always agree, but we do like to banter and exchange ideas. No, it's because all reports are putting those forecasted salary numbers up for Carlsson and Gauthier. It's also because Anaheim has to be prudent because those are not the only RFA's they have to sign. Nothing personal against you, bud. I just call them the way I see them.
The reason Utah signed Cooley for that high of a Number was because they were not sure if Schmaltz was going to re-sign, so they wanted to tie Cooley's contract down before the season started. Anaheim is not under the time pressure with losing a potential UFA like Utah was with Schmaltz. As it sits, they are in a great spot now.