Leafs Rumours Member Posts

 

mph1's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




mph1's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To mph1's Posts

 

 

To mph1's last 5 rumours posts

 

To mph1's last 5 rumour replies

 

mph1's rumours posts with other poster's replies to mph1's rumours posts

 

09 Oct 2017 19:24:20
To leafs gudbranson
To nucks nielsen timishov

Gudbranson is signed for a couple years, plugs a hole with hainsey until lilligren and dermott are NHL ready

Rielly gudbranson
Gardiner zaitsev
Hainsey carrick
Polak gets signed 7th dman

Rosen bergmann in the ahl get minutes with dermott and lillegren

mph1

1.) 09 Oct 2017 20:00:51
Mph1

Rosen and borgman are getting minutes tonight against Chicago. They are NHL players. Sit in corner and give your trades a rest.


2.) 09 Oct 2017 20:34:23
Sorry mackin are you actually replying to a posted trade? Lol. give your opinions a rest and go back to your mom's basement.


3.) 09 Oct 2017 22:12:46
I would absolutely be trying to pry Tanev or Gudbranson out of Vancouver. I think you would have to add a 2nd to this trade though. Guddy is a UFA after this year so he could be extended but he provides a skill set that the Leafs are missing.


4.) 09 Oct 2017 22:13:58
Mph1

Let's just give Rosen and Borgman the minutes and see how they DO. Leafs don't need Erik as they will develop Tim and eeli so they can play top minutes in the future.


5.) 09 Oct 2017 22:16:21
Mph1

You need to be patient, leafs aren't trading for a top defenceman.


6.) 09 Oct 2017 23:39:24
Goatson. yes the MANAGEMENT was patient when they signed marleau weren't they? Lol. we had lievo AND kapanen AND soshnikov waiting in the wings. so don't talk about patience. your logic is flawed. as usual.


7.) 10 Oct 2017 01:19:57
Mph1

When we signed Marleau, we gave away no assets and your trades will never happen trouba? Fualk? And you posted the same stupid trades again and again.


8.) 10 Oct 2017 03:27:23
Scoreboard didn't show it but leafs totally dominate hawks and borgman and Rosen do just fine. Nonsense Penelty against borgman 4 hit on debrincit


Leafs had puck on string all night just sloppy around. The net but speed wore out hawks totally exhausted.


9.) 11 Oct 2017 02:22:03
How did the scoreboard not show it? We won didn't we? The scoreboard to me said 4-3 for the Leafs. Yes, aside from sloppy play in the first, they definitely dominated the majority of the game and it reflected in the scoreboard with a win. a well deserved comeback win.


10.) 11 Oct 2017 21:00:08
I personally really like Borgs game, I haven take been overly impressed with Rosen yet but he can improve. The Leafs really don’t need to trade right now though, Borgs and Carrick is a fine third pairing. Gards and Zaitsev are way better this year, and Rielly and Hainsey I think are as advertised. The Leafs actually have a pretty good group of D, maybe not the best defensively but they can sure move that puck in a hurry, playing in the O zone is ultimately the best defence, and that’s what they have a great ability to do.


11.) 12 Oct 2017 21:27:09
Rosen is clearly not ready for the NHL - Borgman looks alright, To say they look fantastic, they have played 2 nhl games, is not fair - teams are still getting familiar with new systems - goalies are not in form.
It is unfortunate the leafs do not have better options cause these 2 are going to keep getting exposed just like they both did vs the Devils. Send Rosen down and Sign Polak.
Not the answer to anything but a better option than what they have right now.


 

 

09 Oct 2017 01:44:34
Once the ducks get healthy on d with vatanen and lindholm....manson to leafs...jvr dermott bracco to ducks

mph1

1.) 09 Oct 2017 16:31:51
Are you nuts? I would not even do JVR straight for Manson, and if that isnthe price then screw that look for another trade smh.


2.) 09 Oct 2017 17:55:21
Oh yeah it's bigwilly. right how about marincin and a 7th then that sounds more like one of your proposals. no I am not nuts just realistic. yes ducks would take only an Ufa winger for a recently signed top 4 young dman who is tough as nails.


3.) 09 Oct 2017 18:06:09
Furthermore bigwilly. if hamonic cost jvr plus and didn't get it done then manson who I would take over hamonic any day will cost you what I proposed. that's the reality. it's ok to disagree but then back it up with some logic. or don't reply because it makes you look bigsilly mr bigwiily.


4.) 09 Oct 2017 21:00:03
Seriously too much for Manson.


5.) 09 Oct 2017 22:28:29
Gcolpitts. jvr is an ufa. dermott and bracco have not played in the NHL yet. manson is a beast and is signed to a solid contract. hamonic would cost jvr plus. look around the league what dmen cost. sorry but marincin and 2 c prospects won't get it done. saying too much means nothing, put some thought into your reply. or just don't reply.


6.) 10 Oct 2017 06:06:37
Demers just lowered the cost of d men a little bit i say dermott jvr and a 4 th lands you manson.


7.) 11 Oct 2017 21:23:41
Seriously too much for Manson. Go leafs!


8.) 11 Oct 2017 21:24:37
Seriously too much for Manson. Go Leafs!


9.) 11 Oct 2017 21:27:28
Leafs don't need Manson.


10.) 12 Oct 2017 15:32:07
I'm in agreement with gcolpitts and Bigwilly. The Ducks have already identified Manson as one of their top four defenders and are now paying him as one. The Ducks also have depth in their system. They could easily counter Bracco and Dermott with their own organizational depth in Steel and Montour or Larsson.

JVR will probably test free agency. Manson is young enough to stay with his team for years to come. Plus he adds physical elements to his game that other defence do not have. Wingers like JVR are easier to replace than top four defensemen.


 

 

09 Oct 2017 00:43:42
To nucks: lievo dermott
To leafs:tanev

mph1

 

 

08 Oct 2017 14:44:40
To preds jvr
To leafs. Dougherty 1st 2018

mph1

1.) 09 Oct 2017 04:02:49
Not happening. We already had this kind of thread discussion awhile ago. Doughty is a franchise defenceman who is a difference maker on the ice. Plus he logs some of the most minutes in the league which also outlines his importance to the team. JVR is elite but not on the same level. The first is an added overpayment. Doughty alone is worth more than JVR.


2.) 09 Oct 2017 05:10:08
Pretty sure it says Dougherty. From the preds.

Read the entire post before you slam the guy.

I like the trade.


3.) 09 Oct 2017 13:28:14
Ares99R. is that you mackin? because you both don't read posts before replying. lol. can I get a "good grief" from DBF please!


4.) 10 Oct 2017 01:47:19
D O U G H E R T Y preds


D O U G H T Y kings.


5.) 11 Oct 2017 18:39:08
Thank you everyone for clarifying.
My apologies mph1.


6.) 12 Oct 2017 20:49:03
In terms of this trade proposal, I feel the Leafs could do better if they were to trade JVR. D O U G H E R T Y (you can see the similarities in spelling to another well known player) sounds like a promising prospect but if the Leafs are unable to get a top 4 defender from another team, then they could at least attempt to pry away a team's top prospect. In this instance, I would be looking at someone higher up the depth charts than D O U G H E R T Y (hope I spelled that right) .

According to NHL. com the top 5 are: Girard, Kamenev, Fabbro, Tolvanen, and Carrier;

In another promising preds prospects list: the names were similar with the exception of Harper and Trenin;

And in another from the Tennesseean, Tolvanen, Fabbro, Girard, Harper, and Trenin make the top five.

Then there's the ever trendy pyramid ratings where D O U G H T E R Y isn't even listed in the first three tiers. Those of you familiar with the pyramid ratings understand what level prospects an organization has in the fourth and lower tiers.

I had to dig much deeper to find this prospect.

ISS reports that he's "not very creative with the puck" but there is top 4 potential.

Hockeyprospects. com Mark Edwards writes that he "moves the puck but not very dynamic. "

Was drafted in 2014 and been to three rookie camps.

On the forcheck ranked him at 14. Other sites higher but not in the top 5.


 

 

06 Oct 2017 21:57:50
to canes: jvr, carrick, timishov, 2nd 2018
to leafs faulk

mph1

1.) 06 Oct 2017 22:20:40
Great pickup leafs now if Anderson hurt leafs have options this season gets sweeter by the day. Lindbergh 6 th no problem.


2.) 07 Oct 2017 00:27:51
David

Are you high?


3.) 07 Oct 2017 07:19:18
Goatson

Why didn't leafs just claim him then no assets spent?


Because they use two small pieces to be able to send him marlies


4.) 07 Oct 2017 11:17:31
Too much.


5.) 07 Oct 2017 12:50:31
Have to agree with David on this one, a smart pickup for almost nothing. Timashov is buried behind a plethora of wingers and would have a hard time getting minutes with the Marlies. The trade gives the Leafs a lot of flexibility with Picard as far as being able to start him with the Marlies and call ups (Up to 9 games without going through waivers) Good insurance if McEihinney reverts to preseason form both as a back up and injury replacement. Still young enough to improve.


6.) 07 Oct 2017 17:39:42
David

This trade has nothing to do with the Pickard acquisition.


7.) 08 Oct 2017 14:34:00
Most of what mackin says has nothing to do with the trade posted.


 

 

 

mph1 has no Talk Posts

 

 

mph1's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

10 Oct 2017 01:47:19
D O U G H E R T Y preds


D O U G H T Y kings.

mph1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Oct 2017 23:39:24
Goatson. yes the MANAGEMENT was patient when they signed marleau weren't they? Lol. we had lievo AND kapanen AND soshnikov waiting in the wings. so don't talk about patience. your logic is flawed. as usual.

mph1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Oct 2017 22:28:29
Gcolpitts. jvr is an ufa. dermott and bracco have not played in the NHL yet. manson is a beast and is signed to a solid contract. hamonic would cost jvr plus. look around the league what dmen cost. sorry but marincin and 2 c prospects won't get it done. saying too much means nothing, put some thought into your reply. or just don't reply.

mph1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Oct 2017 20:34:23
Sorry mackin are you actually replying to a posted trade? Lol. give your opinions a rest and go back to your mom's basement.

mph1

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Oct 2017 18:06:09
Furthermore bigwilly. if hamonic cost jvr plus and didn't get it done then manson who I would take over hamonic any day will cost you what I proposed. that's the reality. it's ok to disagree but then back it up with some logic. or don't reply because it makes you look bigsilly mr bigwiily.

mph1

 

 

 

mph1 has no Talk Replies