Leafs Rumours Member Posts


Xcing's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

Current Profile Picture:
Click to view larger image
Xcing's Profile Picture


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Xcing's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Xcing's Posts



To Xcing's last 5 rumours posts


To Xcing's last 5 rumour replies


Xcing's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Xcing's rumours posts


08 Apr 2017 20:16:06
3 way trade:

Toronto acquires: Tyler Myers
Calgary acquires: William Nylander
Winnipeg acquires: TJ Brodie

This is just a base but these would be the main pieces.
Winnipeg gets their top pairing/top 4 LHD
Toronto gets their RHD to pair with Reilly and round out their top 4
Calgary gets their top line RW
For each team these players are somewhat expendable and can be dealt to fill a need

1.) 08 Apr 2017 21:22:21
Leafs aren't trading Nylander. Him and Matthews have been great this year. Myers has injury issues and leafs don't need to rush they have time. Plasterer leafs would trade are JVR KOMAROV BOZAK.

2.) 08 Apr 2017 22:10:58

3.) 09 Apr 2017 01:03:35
How are the words "Nylander" and "Expendable" in the same sentence?


4.) 09 Apr 2017 16:45:01
Technically, 'Nylander' and 'expendable' are not in the same sentence. That being said, this proposal is stupid.

5.) 12 Apr 2017 06:06:22
Probably one of the worst proposals. With the expansion draft, Myers can be had for much much less. Nylander is here to stay.



16 Mar 2017 23:13:41
N. Nogier + T. Myers + 4th 2017 for J. Gardiner + B. Leipsic + 2nd 2017

Winnipeg gets their second pairing LH d man and a left winger that can step in next year.
Toronto gets a big RH d man to play with Reilly and a RH d prospect.



22 Feb 2017 14:44:06
B. Pesce + 6th 2017 for W. Nylander + 2nd 2017

If you're going to say unbelievable that's fine just say why and maybe use evidence to support your response. And please atleast look into Pesce's stats not just say "over rated".

1.) 22 Feb 2017 15:27:26

I like PESCE he can be a solid top 4 d for us. But to give up NYLANDER who is having a great full rookie season is too much. NYLANDER drafted in the first round and PESCE drafted in the 2nd?

2.) 22 Feb 2017 15:36:21

3.) 22 Feb 2017 17:55:05
It's not terrible. all these comments of "Nylander is too good to give up" is exactly why other teams would actually covet him and be enough to pry a young Top 4 D-man from another team.

You have to give up something high end, in order to receive something high end.

I think the Leafs will wait until the summer, see who's available via free agency (and at what price) and if they can't land a UFA then they will need to consider a trade. JVR's value will go down as he will less contract term, so Nylander would likely be their most attractive trading chip!

4.) 22 Feb 2017 18:14:01
The Leafs will wait til before the expansion draft to acquire a D-man from a team not wanting to lose for nothing.

5.) 22 Feb 2017 18:26:39
Just some stats I'm throwing out there (Comparing Pesce to Rielly)
Category: Winner
Points: Rielly
ATOI: Reilly
Hits: Pesce
+/ -: Pesce
GV: Pesce (Has less)
TK: Pesce
BLK: Pesce
CF%: Pesce
FF%: Pesce
Also Pesce is Right handed so value is increased
No knock against Rielly but Pesce is better than a lot of people realize. He could get Nylander.

6.) 22 Feb 2017 18:43:02
Different team, different responsibilities. You can't compare two players in those basis.

7.) 22 Feb 2017 18:46:32
On what basis every conceivable stat?

8.) 22 Feb 2017 23:22:20
Keep your man. we'll keep Nylander.

9.) 23 Feb 2017 00:00:48
Ok sure but fills a need for both teams. Unless you believe you defense is fine.

10.) 23 Feb 2017 11:42:42
No way you trade Nylander unless it is for a young, proven top 2 RHD.



19 Feb 2017 03:02:49
JVR for K. Bieksa + M. Jones + J. Larson + Conditional 3rd 2017
Condition: Becomes a 2nd in 2017 if Anaheim advances to Western Confrence finals

1.) 19 Feb 2017 04:37:09
Ducks add. We are doing them a favour by taking BIEKSA and a conditional pick that is low. Larson and Jones are unproven players.

2.) 19 Feb 2017 15:11:45
I like how I posted this exact trade on the regular rumours site and they said Leafs add. Does this say anything about bias?



29 Sep 2016 02:57:48
Toronto: JVR + 2nd + Tobias Lindberg + Jeremy Bracco
Winnipeg: Trouba
Anaheim: Fowler + Rakell

Toronto: Trouba + Rakell
Winnipeg: Fowler + Jeremy Bracco
Anaheim: JVR + 2nd Round Pick + Tobias Lindberg

Toronto get a RHD to play with Reilly and a good young C/ RW. Anaheim gets a LW to play on the top line and a high 2nd Round Pick and an almost NHL ready prospect. Winnipeg receives a LHD and a good prospect. They then have enough prospects that they could use some as trade bait. Toronto would have to clear up cap space to sign both RFAs.
I think it fills needs for each team.

1.) 29 Sep 2016 13:55:43
Take out the pick

2.) 29 Sep 2016 17:48:24
JVR + 2nd and 2 prospects just for Trouba? No

3.) 29 Sep 2016 17:49:06
I didn't read all the way through, never mind.

4.) 29 Sep 2016 20:31:21
Still too much for the Leafs to give up.




Xcing has no Talk Posts



Xcing's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

12 May 2018 22:11:46
Kadri wouldn’t replace Backlund on the second line so there goes that. Calgary already has a Gardiner type d man in brodie on the left side. Doesn’t make sense to break up their balance of left and right d men. Also hamilton is worth just as much if not more than Marner.



Click To View This Thread

12 May 2018 20:58:29



Click To View This Thread

12 May 2018 20:58:02
No from Calgary, they don’t need Kadri or Gardiner. Also they 100% should NOT trade Hamilton but if they did Marner would have to be coming back.



Click To View This Thread

28 Apr 2018 22:22:41
Arizona wouldn’t do that. Strome still has decent potential but Dahlin could very well get better than Matthews.



Click To View This Thread

27 Feb 2018 02:09:44
Drop the first, Faulk and Gauthier and you’re in the ball park.




Xcing has no Talk Replies