Leafs Rumours Member Posts

 

Leafs1994's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Leafs1994's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Leafs1994's Posts

 

 

To Leafs1994's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Leafs1994's last 5 rumour replies

 

Leafs1994's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Leafs1994's rumours posts

 

20 Nov 2018 16:10:25
So Florida is a mess and they just lost one of their top guys so they may be in for a roster shake up

Tor: nylander gardiner pick/prospects

Fla: huberdeau petrovic

I think this trade is there value wise
Nylander = huderdeau
Gardiner = petrovic

Both teams win here Toronto adds a pick or prospect due to the fact that Florida has to sign nylander and gardiner is a ufa

Leafs1994

1.) 20 Nov 2018 18:23:25
Leafs1994. I love it. Huberdeau is outstanding. He really is. The problem as I see it is that Florida just lost Trocheck. And it doesn’t sound like he will be coming back anytime soon either. So they will be wanting to replace his offense, yes. But they will be looking for addition without subtraction. So, while the interest in Nylander is real, it’s unlikely the Panthers would be wanting to deal Trocheck to get him. But hey, that’s just my opinion. If Florida wanted to make this deal, Leafs should jump all over it. Huberdeau replaces Nylander’s offense and Petrovic gives us Hainsey’s replacement and shores up that right side until Nylander is ready.

Outstanding. Leafs1994, you posted a good one today. I love it. Huberdeau and Petrovic is better than the Doublemint twins.


2.) 20 Nov 2018 18:31:53
nylander for Huberdeau+.


3.) 20 Nov 2018 18:39:06
Love it. I think petrovic is a great pickup.


4.) 20 Nov 2018 19:20:19
Ok then if the leafs had to add then I would add either brown or leivo or Johnson and a 1st I think this trade makes the leafs a cup favourite don’t forget too Florida is a tax free state therefore nylander wouldn’t probably cost as much to sign for them

Tor: nylander gardiner brown 1st

Fla: huderdeau petrovic conditional 4th if both my lander and gardiner sign

I look at it as nylander brings something different than huderdeau and gardiner brings my offence from the back end something they lack and brown is a work horse and a great pk guy in my opinion leafs are in a win now mode.


5.) 20 Nov 2018 21:30:52
My god. You really want Huberdeau eh? I don’t blame you. Damn good player he is. He really is. Look at it this way, if Gardiner = Petrovic (actually Gardiner is probably worth more) than Nylander = Huberdeau (again, Nylander is probably worth more) . So by adding Brown + 1st, and understanding Huberdeau’s contract is only half as long as Nylander’s, you virtually guarantee this deal gets done. What I was eluding to in my previous reply though was not so much as adding more players from our side, but instead change the incoming players. Instead of giving them Brown and 1st, why not instead keep the offer just Nylander + Gardiner and instead ask for tippett + 1st to go along with Petrovic instead of Huberdeau. Now Florida doesn’t lose anyone significant off the current roster. It’s addition without subtraction. And when Trocheck comes back, they have Nylander’s added offense as well.

Nylander is here and now. Florida can really use him. Tippett is very highly rated, and that 1st could easily be a top 10 pick again. It’s a low risk/ high reward style trade for Leafs.


6.) 20 Nov 2018 21:43:28
Not a bad deal at all. huberdeau would be a welcome addition. No need trying to change it. if both teams agree it's a solid deal.


7.) 20 Nov 2018 23:32:17
Huberdeau or nothing lol we want an all star also I think since he plays on the left wing it’s also helps strengthen our left side think about this line

Huberdeau mathews kapanen

Damn.


 

 

19 Nov 2018 20:33:02
Suggested trades to Calgary;

Tor: nylander, gardiner

Cgf: Bennett, hanifin, 3rd

Or

Tor: nylander, gardiner, 1st

Cfg: dube, hamonic

The first one is more realistic but Bennett is still only 22 and we could play him at 3c or on the wing and hanifin is a big kid with the right coach could be a great player. Like I said the second trade isn't as close don't know if Calgary would give up dube

Leafs1994

1.) 19 Nov 2018 22:14:32
If Calgary will do first deal I say go for it. hanafin will be better than Gardiner in a few years if not now and Bennett could use the change. Nylander would be a great addition for Calgary. no more hanafin vs Marner crap. the leafs would have both.

I like it., good thought.


2.) 20 Nov 2018 02:05:14
I absolutely love that first trade. Young Hanifin is outstanding. He really is. I don’t know if he will ever be better than Gardiner. I know it’s fun to poke jokes about Gardiner and laugh about how he can’t skate backwards. But at the end of the day, his possession metrics are among the best in the league and he gets 50+ points while staying in the + side of +/ -. If Hanifin works out so well, then Leafs got a good return.

Not sure if Calgary can afford both Nylander and Gardiner. But finances aside, this would be a smart move for both teams.

I love it. I really do. You drive a hard bargain. I’ve met used car salesmen that aren’t so aggressive. Keep em coming Leafs1994. It’s guys like you that make this site enjoyable.


3.) 20 Nov 2018 10:51:34
Dube and Ramus Andersson would work.
Why would the Leafs want Hamonic?


 

 

17 Nov 2018 23:04:01
Still thin Carolina or philly are the teams to trade with but I don't mind a trade like this

Tor: nylander borgman brocco

Nyr: kreider poink

Kreider is another speedy winger that would Ben a solid depth move

Leafs1994

1.) 18 Nov 2018 04:24:42
I really like targeting NYR as a team looking to make changes still. Already having made a couple big moves last year, they may be willing to part with Kreider if they don’t feel they are competitive still. Considering his outstanding start to the season, and the fact he still has another year on his contract after this, Rangers might feel the urge to trade Hayes or Zuccarello first, but I think if Dubas insisted on Kreider and was offering Nylander+ as you have suggested here, they would jump on it.

Depending on his performance, Kreider might price himself out of our budget. But that’s okay, because the other significant piece you would be bringing in is Pionk. He’s really coming into his own, and helps fill a glaring need. Young, talented, and cost controlled, he could be a real steal. If Pionk continues to perform at current levels, he would make Zaitsev expendable. And I like that idea.

I think you’ve put together a significant offer here. Both Leafs and Rangers have incentive to move the suggested players that centrepiece the trade. If we could get Kreider to re-sign 5 x $6-$7M like we were willing to pay Nylander, then Leafs do well here.


2.) 18 Nov 2018 05:22:47
I agree I think that the rangers are a rebuilding team and I think it would be silly if the didn’t accept a trade for nylander I think the challenge would be getting point since they don’t have many quality defencemen and young ones at that.

My outlook on trading nylander is that we don’t need a big name player that we can’t afford down the road so get a guy that can play in the top four because we got guys like liljgren and sandin coming up the next couple years. For resigning kreider I think we will have the cap space if we wanted to but remember he will be 29 so how much would he really be worth.


3.) 18 Nov 2018 05:52:27
Love kreider. big fast alright shot and could be a beast beside matthews.

Definetly great target to get from Rangers

Rangers won't want to give up picks or prospects too highly since they want to rebuild . that said, if adding Bracco to this deal rangers need to give up deangelo. a Dubas guy and would help leafs and this deal be more accepted overall.


4.) 18 Nov 2018 06:21:50
For Kreider. Hard to say. He’s having an oustanding start to the season. At current production he’s on pace for 42 goals and 72 points. Would be breakout for him and his best year so far.

5x$7 is acceptable I would think. Using Marleau as comparable, Marleau has similar stats, and is making about that kind of money. 5 years is long enough. We don’t want to see him decline early and we’re stuck with a boat anchor we can’t get out from under.


 

 

16 Nov 2018 19:31:40
Just read an article about the leafs and jets talking trouba for nylander and the the jets would probably flip nylander that pretty interesting but I think it's just as important to get a depth winger back as well so here's what I purpose

Tor: nylander Johnson 2nd

Win: trouba Lowry

So I know trouba hasn't been the healthiest player but when he is he is pretty effective and he played with Reilly in the World Cup.... that's all I got. Now Lowry why do we want him my thought is he is 6'5 and he's pretty good in the face off circle so I'd have him center the third line and move kadri to the wing possibly with Mathews or still on the third line

Leafs1994

1.) 16 Nov 2018 21:13:46
Stop reading from hockey buzz. might as well talk to my grandma. yes I read it too but the guy is an total idiot.


2.) 17 Nov 2018 00:05:03
A year of Trouba for 8 of Nylander. if the jets will add to this deal I may open for a conversations. by add I mean that Lowry thought plus a prospect and possibly a pick. leafs add Holl instead of Johnsson.


3.) 17 Nov 2018 00:18:39
Said it before, and will say it again: Trouba is greedy and injury probe. Only reason Jets trade him is because they don’t want to have to go through negotiations with him again next year. If you think negotiations with Nylander haven’t been going well, just imagine the headache dealing with Trouba will be next year when we already have Matthews and Marner to deal with.

Lowry is a solid pick up. Love his size. Putting him center is interesting, but would also make good on LW to help strengthen that side out a bit more.


4.) 17 Nov 2018 01:15:04
Not a chance from Winnipeg. That offer wouldn't be close on Trouba, so no chance you get Lowry as well.

You have to ask yourself what the Leafs would want for Reilly and base your offer for Trouba along those guidelines.


 

 

12 Nov 2018 01:35:37
So guessing the canes wouldn't make this trade but here's what might get it done.

Tor: nylander brocco

Car: Hamilton gauthier

Might be picks added but I think the value is there tho

Another trade I like is this....

Tor: nylander gardiner

Ana: Henrique lindholm

So I think Manson is a good player but I like lindholm more and I think in the long run he would be cheaper. As for Henrique I think he is a great player I could see him playing on the Mathews line yes marleau is a beaut but I don't think he suits Mathews playing style instead put him with kadri and brown and you got a solid shut down line

Leafs1994

1.) 12 Nov 2018 03:13:33
Hamilton is a headcase. Not interested. I think he melts under lights of Toronto. Couldn't handle Calgary. Won't make it here. I know he Ontario boy but big difference playing minor and junior hockey here compared to bright lights of Toronto. He can hide in non hockey market.

Lindholm is #1 dman with Ducks. I quite like Manson but Lindholm is better overall. Better chance to get Manson.

How do you see Lindholm being cheaper?


2.) 12 Nov 2018 04:47:57
@rocket9
How is Hamilton a head case he did great in Calgary he was a 30-40 point man I think the media thing in Toronto is a little over hyped

And lindholm is second pairing on the ducks Manson is first pairing with Fowler I think Lind Holme has lots of potential he may not be cheaper then Manson but Manson isn’t as good as people say so i think lindholm is the better option here the only thing Manson offers is a rhd.


3.) 12 Nov 2018 06:02:38
Anaheim had to trade Vatanen in order to get Henrique. I’m just not seeing the value returned here. If Nylander~Lindholm, then Henrique>>Gardiner.

Bringing in Lindholm to replace Gardiner keeps us strong on left side and gives us a possible replacement for Rielly if we decide we can’t re-sign him due to cap reasons.

Having Henriqie on the team would give us even greater flexibility by leaving us with the option of using Kadri om Matthews wing, thereby shorong up that LW position, and using lindholm, gauthier, Henrique as our centers?


4.) 12 Nov 2018 11:13:53
I like this. good deal.


5.) 12 Nov 2018 13:07:20
@leafsgm
I think Anaheim traded vatenen because they had players coming up but your also right leafs would have to add a 2nd or a prospect maybe Trevor Moore or brocco.


 

 

 

Leafs1994 has no Talk Posts

 

 

Leafs1994's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

20 Nov 2018 23:32:17
Huberdeau or nothing lol we want an all star also I think since he plays on the left wing it’s also helps strengthen our left side think about this line

Huberdeau mathews kapanen

Damn.

Leafs1994

 

 

Click To View This Thread

20 Nov 2018 19:25:17
Isn’t rather keep kapanen yea he doesn’t have the passing ability of nylander but he’s more use full

-crazy speed
-good shot
- can play physical
-great pk guy
-at times has some great hands

All nylander give us is passing a shot and an anchor of a contact also kapanen would only make 4 mil a yea tops unless he starts piping out 70pts a year.

Leafs1994

 

 

Click To View This Thread

20 Nov 2018 19:20:19
Ok then if the leafs had to add then I would add either brown or leivo or Johnson and a 1st I think this trade makes the leafs a cup favourite don’t forget too Florida is a tax free state therefore nylander wouldn’t probably cost as much to sign for them

Tor: nylander gardiner brown 1st

Fla: huderdeau petrovic conditional 4th if both my lander and gardiner sign

I look at it as nylander brings something different than huderdeau and gardiner brings my offence from the back end something they lack and brown is a work horse and a great pk guy in my opinion leafs are in a win now mode.

Leafs1994

 

 

Click To View This Thread

18 Nov 2018 20:50:00
You got to remember that petragelo (not how you spell it) isn’t getting any younger and parayko is their next top guy so why would they move him.

Leafs1994

 

 

Click To View This Thread

18 Nov 2018 20:47:11
I don’t understand why people want montour yea he put up some good points last year but he isn’t that good on the defence side only player I would take from Anaheim is lindholm top tier winger for top tier defencemen.

Leafs1994

 

 

 

Leafs1994 has no Talk Replies