Leafs Rumours Member Posts

 

Keon14's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Keon14's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Keon14's Posts

 

 

To Keon14's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Keon14's last 5 rumour replies

 

Keon14's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Keon14's rumours posts

 

09 Jan 2018 18:22:10
Toronto. Marner Leivo Gardner 2018 1st

Ottawa karlson.

Keon14

1.) 09 Jan 2018 19:09:28
Looks like someone else fell off their rocker typing this bull up. A possible superstar and a first rounder for some plug who has less points than our very own Morgan Rielly. But for an extra 4-5 million cap you plug.


2.) 10 Jan 2018 17:28:32
Always like these people that just criticize and never make a proposal themselves common real deal let’s hear your brilliant trades.


 

 

12 Sep 2017 21:54:47
Toronto- Bozak

Pittsburgh-1st round pick


Toronto- Leivo 2018 1st and 2019 2nd

Vancouver- Tanev.

Keon14

1.) 12 Sep 2017 23:57:04
Just don't see the Leafs trading from an area of weakness. Centre is a position we have perilously little depth.

Too much for Tanev.


2.) 13 Sep 2017 04:18:21
Chrisdafish

I don't like his trade but your saying centre is not our strength it's our best strength late this season

Matthews
Nylander
Kadri
Moore


Coming soon

Gauthier
Brooks.


3.) 13 Sep 2017 13:05:01
@keon14 i posted before that I think bozak will be back. He's a leader who's become a norm in toronto media and can help a guy like marner maybe make the transition to center or even nylaner. Thinking front loaded 4 years 13-15 mill. As for tanev I don't think you need to give up that much. Although you will have to switch to a D prospect. If vancouver trades tanev they will want to fill his spot from the system and have a guy they can watch grow in a year or two. Think Neilson. Good trade tho. Maybe get rid of the second. Vancouver will be desperate. Although I don't think the leafs do either, good ideas tho.

@davidmakin just because you name off prospects doesn't mean we have depth. 3 out of 6 have never played center in the nhl (besides nylanders 10faceoffs last season and Freddie 5 games or so) I also believe they are weak down the middle. Brooks is unproven in the nhl could be another Freddy the goat. As for Gauthier he's a call up plug in 4th line player that they might use on the pk during the season. He really has no value other than being a call up when desperate.


4.) 16 Sep 2017 04:17:58
Nylander will play wing this year, and most likely will play wing his entire career. While he is easily capable of playing top line wing, his lack of size, leadership, and poor defensive play means he will never be a number one center. Personally, I think we should trade Nylander and bring in RNH to be our number two center. Nylander is easily the most expendable of our top four forwards and will fetch a high return. And with the picks and prospects we get from trading JVR and Bozak and with what's already in the system, a package for RNH would be possible.


5.) 16 Sep 2017 19:19:23
RNH is an injury waiting to happen. really poor idea.


 

 

26 Aug 2017 17:46:20
It has been reported that Lou and Babcock were in Russia to meet with Moscow defenceman Igor Ozhinov. He has 1 year left on ho contract is 25 and shoots right.

Think this is a sign that Toronto will not be trading for a RHD and if inked to a deal it will be the same path Zaitsev took who by the way played with Ozhinov in Moscow.

Keon14

1.) 26 Aug 2017 19:39:57
Let's hope he signs next summer. Who has better team Toronto or Edmonton I say Toronto.


2.) 27 Aug 2017 00:31:56
Agreed Davidmackin although I could be biased into thinking so. But I do think the leafs are more than just Matthews and they are also not tied to any contracts that may haunt them.


3.) 27 Aug 2017 01:24:20
Leafs have big three Matthews mariner and nylander and we don't know what kapanen I say capable of yet three great players brings cups Chicago Pittsburgh.


4.) 27 Aug 2017 09:37:46
Will be interesting to watch marlies Andreas johnsson Bracco brooks timashov liljegren and Nielsen and from Russia keep an eye on korshkov he will put up numbers in khl.


5.) 27 Aug 2017 18:17:21
Good points David couldn't agree more.


 

 

23 Aug 2017 22:55:53
Biased? Far from it. Read the post it would be a signed JVR. In the Hamonic case it was a 1 year JVR

Carolina has a large amount invested in their d core. Yes Skinner is good but what's wrong with trying to improve offensively. By the way Goat wondering why I rarely see you be productive on this site and play the part of a judge. Do I think these transactions will happen? No but this site is for fun peace bro.

Keon14

1.) 24 Aug 2017 03:45:47
Agreed ^
Goatson, ya seem like a bitter old man always chopping up others ideas. Some deserve it, some don't. Its okay not to agree that's what the votes are for.


2.) 24 Aug 2017 15:38:19
JVR would be best suited on a contending team just like Phil with pitts, yes canes would want to improve offensively but they're giving up two much. JVR is good but he's already 28 and a team like the canes won't want him long term, giving up a 25 years old top d plus a 2nd is bad for them. Look at the Taylor hall deal, he is signed for multiple years, young, better than JVR and only got Adam Larsson in return, I'm sorry if I offended you.


 

 

23 Aug 2017 19:20:03
Going to go off the wall with this one. Sign and trade deals are done all the time in the NBA good one be done in the NHL wondering how interested JVR would be being united with his brother in Carolina. What is a 30 goal scorer Worth in free agency. Maybe 7,000,000 over five years

Toronto signs JVR to the contract since him to Carolina for Justin Faulk and a second.

Keon14

1.) 23 Aug 2017 20:49:49
I think Toronto adds a lot in this deal.


2.) 23 Aug 2017 21:21:58
As nice as the sign and trade deals are for the NBA, they are not viable options in the NHL, as all teams can offer similar contracts provided they do not exceed individual player and team cap totals. That being said, what the Leafs could do is in the case of making a deal with a team like Carolina, they could allow for the Canes management team to have open discussions with JVR about signing a long-term deal. By doing so, the Leafs would potentially increase their return. More often than not, you don’t hear of teams giving permission to speak with other team’s players as this would set a bad precedence within a franchise for dealing with pending free agents.


3.) 23 Aug 2017 21:59:44
Why would Carolina do this? JVR is aging while Faulk is heading into his prime. They already have Skinner and aho who are better, fualk is going to lead all the young d in Carolina . If Islanders rejected JVR plus a 1st for harmonic, what makes you think Carolina would trade Faulk ( better than hamonic) plus a 2nd? This is an example of how biased a fan can be.


4.) 23 Aug 2017 22:09:34
JVR is plenty for Faulk and a second.


5.) 24 Aug 2017 00:06:13
Fair comparison Goatson. The Harmonic trade rejection gives some evidence for JVR's perceived value. Toronto would have a better chance in flipping JVR for a team's top prospect.


6.) 24 Aug 2017 00:40:11
TJ Oshie was signed for $5.75 MM for 6 years or more. He is 30 years old, and his scoring prowess is the same as JVR.

That is the value JVR is worth. Sign him and keep him, trade Bozak, Martin or Komorov. Than hope the cap goes up 3 to 5% in each of the next two years.

Sign Gardiner for $5.5 MM for 6 years. Extend him now.

That way the Leafs can play with another 8 young prospects who may have 1 or 2 years of experience by 2019/ 20.

Bozak, Komorov or Martin that is who the Leafs should trade and try to maximize the return in young talent or draft picks.


7.) 24 Aug 2017 02:30:48
Heatdreamer,
I wouldn't compare the Oshie signing with the Leafs situation and JVR. It has been speculated that JVR's new contract will command north of 6 million and maybe around 7 which means the Leafs may need to pass when you factor in who they will need to sign in a couple of years. Washington has taken some flak since signing Oshie to his new deal. They've lost a couple of their younger players and are still anchored to heavy contracts like Ovechkin's. Just because the Caps were foolish enough to overpay an aging forward doesn't mean the Leafs should follow suit. Advance statistics illustrate that Oshie played above his norm and indicate that his most recent level of production is unlikely to continue. The Oshie deal may look okay for now, but that's a deal that the Caps may regret down the road as Oshie's production declines.

Any good team shouldn't just make trades and hope for cap limits to increase. That isn't smart cap management. What if the cap doesn't increase by the desired amount? Then what? Your team will be forced to make some hard decisions.

Gardiner is another player who make ask for more than 6 million per. Is that an amount that the Leafs can include on their payroll moving forward?

Martin isn't going anywhere for the time being so any trade proposals which include him are not happening whether we like it or not. The Leafs overpaid to get this guy and they used one of their protection spots during the expansion draft. From what I've read and heard about him, is that he's a 'glue guy' and great in the dressing room. There are some intangibles that we are not aware of that all teams like the Leafs might value more than acquiring a draft pick.


8.) 24 Aug 2017 20:07:35
A lot of people over a period of time have made reference to the Larson/ Hall trade as the sign of the times. my opinion is that just because a G. M. makes a foolish move doesn't mean that all G. M. 's are foolish as well. Other G. M's will then want the Larson/ Hall trade to be the trend setter but, If one G. M. turns down a trade does that mean that all G. M. 's will turn down all trades. no. of course not. So, please don't paint all G. M. 's with the same brush, because some deals are desired more, and some are realistic.


9.) 24 Aug 2017 22:51:13
Fermanaghlad,

Would you please clarify what you meant in your most recent post?

Thanks.


10.) 25 Aug 2017 17:48:49
Fermanaghlad,

Trend setting is a common theme in the NHL.

Everything big that happens with one team, creates a ripple effect throughout the league. For instance, the signing of McDavid’s massive contract will definitely impact negotiations for other star players in this league as athletes want to be paid according to “market trends. ” Hockey analysts speculate the “middle class” of the NHL may be in jeopardy because of these deals. But that’s another thread altogether. Trades work very much in the same way. This isn’t to say that the Oilers have now established a definitive market price for a top pairing defenceman, but other teams have noted the cost the Oilers were willing to meet thus creating similar expectations.

I’m assuming that the reason why the Leafs have yet to land their top pairing defender is that most teams covet one of their young studs in return, and I’m positive that’s when Lamoriello politely declines and hangs up the phone. The Leafs tried with Harmonic, hoping that a top 4 could be landed. Perhaps they will revisit a trade option like this towards the trade deadline. Unlikely though as teams interested in trading for JVR at the deadline will be playoff contending teams looking to load up; not adding by subtracting from their rosters but by offering futures instead.

You may recall a couple of seasons ago, the Leafs had a guy named Parenteau of whom they tried to move at the trade deadline but were unsuccessful. Many were surprised to see Parenteau still with the Leafs post-trade deadline. Sources later revealed that Lamoriello was unwilling to bend from his asking price as it would affect his current and future negotiations. His rationale was that if he caved and just got whatever was offered, when he needed to return to the table again in the future, he would have already set the market price with the original Parenteau deal. To give an example, the Isles, who were reportedly interested in Parenteau, were unwilling to part with Toronto’s asking price of a 2nd round pick, even though, Andrew Ladd, who held identical offensive numbers, but for more than double the salary, was traded for a prospect, 1st and 3rd round pick. In retrospect a 2nd round pick didn’t sound like an overpayment for someone like Parenteau but the Isles were not willing to go that high.

The much debated Larsson/ Hall trade will be ongoing until long after these players have moved on from their prospective teams. We can debate about whether Chiarelli overpaid for Larsson or whether Shero fleeced the Oilers GM, but several trends have emerged since the implementation of a hard salary cap.
So this isn’t a painting of the brush or labelling all GM’s the same, but you can’t help but ignore the market trends.


 

 

 

Keon14 has no Talk Posts

 

 

Keon14's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

10 Jan 2018 17:28:32
Always like these people that just criticize and never make a proposal themselves common real deal let’s hear your brilliant trades.

Keon14

 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Aug 2017 18:17:21
Good points David couldn't agree more.

Keon14

 

 

Click To View This Thread

23 Aug 2017 16:18:13
Where is Zaitsev.

Keon14

 

 

Click To View This Thread

18 Aug 2017 16:02:44
Strongly agree with you Dbone JVR for picks might be the best option. If Toronto is to trade Bozak as well I like to see a pick coming back as well. The Leafs have seemed to address their defence through the draft for the future, moving forward imo the Leafs should continue to build through the draft maybe concentrating at center.

Keon14

 

 

Click To View This Thread

16 Aug 2017 17:43:39
Most definitely Babcock knows more than I but I think he doesn't have much choice does he DBF. Who should he pair Reilly with, Carrick? Not If there are no further changes we will see how well Hainsey holds up playing against the oppositions top line every game especially at his age.

Keon14

 

 

 

Keon14 has no Talk Replies