Leafs Trade Rumors

 

Use our rumours form to send us leafs trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)
 

Correct Score Competition Entry

This page last updated: 21:46:05

20 Jan 2017 19:24:24
If leafs do make the playoffs and finish top 20 in the draft they should trade the 1st considering this years draft is weak and they have 2 seconds

To LEAFS: PULOCK

To ISLANDERS: 2017 1st round pick

Believable2 Unbelievable3

20 Jan 2017 20:42:44
worst trade ever

Agree1 Disagree2

20 Jan 2017 21:10:05
Luca

"Worst trade ever" let's see your trade JVR and CARRICK for oleksiak? You traded a top 6 foward and a pontencial top 4 young d man for a LD you can't even make a bad stars lineup? So you better shut up and look at your terrible trades You are probably a little kid who thought phaneuf was our best leaf player

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 21:35:19
Can't see why Pulock has a 1st round pick value at all. He has not cracked the NHL and although promising still, is bordering on potential bust status if he can not crack the NHL next season. 2nd or 3rd round pick at best. Even Yakupov only went for a prospect and a 3rd (could turn into a 2nd)

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 21:35:53
Cal foote first round he will be great dman

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 16:38:33
NYIslanders Trade
Ladd
Cizikas
Pulock (AHL)
(Islanders retain 1.5 Million yearly until Ladd's Contract is finished)

Toronto Trades
Soshnikov
Gauthier
Wrenn (AHL)

Thoughts?

Believable1 Unbelievable4

20 Jan 2017 16:53:02
Minus Ladd and everything looks good

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 16:53:51
Lindholm maybe the one ducks want to move. They have many studs in system on defence and lindholm 5 yrs after this one moving him would give ducks more cap flexibility.

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 16:56:45
Pinball if you don't stop the Ladd trade talk someone is going to kick your ass.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 17:47:02
hampus lindholm would be a huge upgrade on a lot of teams. i'm not sure the ducks would move him tho as they are going for the cup and he is a top 2 defender for them.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 18:01:35
TMLFORLIFE

Leafs can put a package together that ducks need maybe offseason. That 50% salary carrot is a help only leafs can offer.

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 19:36:12
IF the ducks trade anyone in top 4 it's Fowler

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 20:18:17
Pinball

Do you have a crush on LADD?

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 16:14:15
Ducks lindholm

Toronto JVR 50% retained 2nd Rd pick 2017 timashov


Defenceman are expensive folks I think it's enough and leafs don't lose any major prospects

Believable1 Unbelievable3

20 Jan 2017 18:29:22
I really like this trade but I don't think the ducks would do it

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 18:45:09
I don't think this gets you anywhere Lindholm. If it did it would be done already and Murray would be fired

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 20:19:40
David

We have too many LHD with NEILSON and DERMOTT coming up we need more RHD!

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 04:16:58
San Jose Sharks: D- Dylan Demelo, he's is a young, right handed defensive defenceman. Basically a younger better Polak with time to grow (he is only 23)

Toronto Maple Leafs: Polak/ Hunwick and a conditional 5th round pick in 2017 (condition is if the Sharks make the finals it becomes a 4th)

Believable2 Unbelievable4

20 Jan 2017 18:52:26
Sorry David it's not enough. The second probably needs to be a first and you need a better prospect going the other way instead of Timoshov to even have a chance to do this deal. I'm not quite sure that us Leaf fans understand how good Lindholm actually is. He's an incredible defender.

Agree0 Disagree1

20 Jan 2017 04:40:15
To LEAFS: P. MYERS + RUBSTOV + 2017 1st round pick

To FLYERS: JVR + CORRADO + 2017 (OTT) 2nd round pick

JVR fits their needs. We get two good prospects one is a potential top 4 d and RUBSTOV can solidify our centre core. Flyers have a deep defence pool and have so many good centres

Believable2 Unbelievable3

20 Jan 2017 14:52:46
Let them keep Rubstov, nothing there shows he will materialize yet, althouh that could change.

Take out the 2017 2nd and replace Rubstov with Sanheim

To TOR: D - T. Sanheim + D - P - Myers + 2017 1st round pick

To PHA: F - JVR + D - F. Corrado

Agree0 Disagree1

20 Jan 2017 15:24:42
No way Flyers give that much unless they get another lower prospect like Lindberg or Valiev

Agree0 Disagree1

20 Jan 2017 16:42:11
JVR's value is a top prospect, a 1st round pick plus another prospect! If the Leafs do not get that, then keep him. There is no need to trade him

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 02:17:52
TOR:
Trouba, 17 2nd rd pick

WIN:
Nylander

Believable0 Unbelievable4

20 Jan 2017 13:22:57
Shw

Why nylander JVR 27 yrs old who has upside nylander or JVR maybe your confused

Agree0 Disagree1

20 Jan 2017 13:49:54
Players get better and players get worse you want to trade guys on downside right now JVReaking Bozak and Komarov on way down

Agree0 Disagree2

20 Jan 2017 13:51:30
Players get better and players get worse you want to trade guys on downside right now JVReaking Bozak and Komarov on way down

Agree0 Disagree3

19 Jan 2017 23:37:38
Bozak nylander for montour fowler

Believable0 Unbelievable5

20 Jan 2017 14:54:49
The Leafs have no need for a LHD in Fowler unless you're flipping him for a RHD

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Jan 2017 23:25:31
Bozak dermott for hamonic strome

Believable2 Unbelievable3

20 Jan 2017 04:37:05
New York does not have much use for Bozak this year, so maybe swap bozak for Timashov and this could work possibly give or take a 3rd

Agree1 Disagree5

20 Jan 2017 14:20:41
And you told me the other teams will never do my trades. Take a look in the mirror smh

Agree1 Disagree0

19 Jan 2017 23:06:27
To LEAFS: PULOCK

To ISLANDERS: 2017 2nd round pick + 2017 (OTT) 2nd round pick

Believable4 Unbelievable5

19 Jan 2017 23:20:41
Nope from garth

Agree2 Disagree3

20 Jan 2017 04:37:54
You never know with this trade, New York can not protect Pulock for the Expansion draft

Agree3 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 09:57:14
would love to see this happen, not sure Islanders would accept.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Jan 2017 21:31:00
Tor:JVR

Ana:Vatanen

Believable1 Unbelievable5

20 Jan 2017 00:27:00
I posted a trade a couple months ago circling these two. Unfortunately Vatanen is significantly more valuable than JVR because of their positions, even with them being similar skill wise. We'd likely have to a add a first just so the ducks don't hang up on us

Agree0 Disagree3

20 Jan 2017 14:48:58
It might require a second Rd pick JVR and Timashov to get vatanan and if I'm leafs I do that deal

Agree0 Disagree1

20 Jan 2017 14:56:01
The Leafs are certainly not adding here.

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Jan 2017 16:57:40
Vatanen is not even close to being worth that much

Agree0 Disagree0


Leafs Rumours 2


Leafs Rumours 3

Cell phone only version of this site: http://mobile.leafs-rumours.com

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass